<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Failed Shorty Q&amp;A With Susannah Breslin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therumpus.net/2009/01/the-failed-shorty-qa-with-susannah-breslin-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/01/the-failed-shorty-qa-with-susannah-breslin-2/</link>
	<description>Books, Music, Movies, Art, Politics, Sex, Other</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:55:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mastro</title>
		<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/01/the-failed-shorty-qa-with-susannah-breslin-2/comment-page-1/#comment-232512</link>
		<dc:creator>Mastro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therumpus.net/?p=5548#comment-232512</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get the refusal to answer one question.   Sure- I understand the private sex questions-I&#039;d give that nonanswer but this is a woman who writes about the porn industry.

I imagine every interviewer asks questions that the interviewee has heard before.   Their reaction might serve us as a personality test.  Referring the interviewer back to the web for previous interviews doesn&#039;t seem like a reasonable request.

Usually people become celebs before they start acting this way.  Breslin is just ahead of the curve.  Maybe we should grateful for something new-</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get the refusal to answer one question.   Sure- I understand the private sex questions-I&#8217;d give that nonanswer but this is a woman who writes about the porn industry.</p>
<p>I imagine every interviewer asks questions that the interviewee has heard before.   Their reaction might serve us as a personality test.  Referring the interviewer back to the web for previous interviews doesn&#8217;t seem like a reasonable request.</p>
<p>Usually people become celebs before they start acting this way.  Breslin is just ahead of the curve.  Maybe we should grateful for something new-</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amstutz</title>
		<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/01/the-failed-shorty-qa-with-susannah-breslin-2/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Amstutz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 02:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therumpus.net/?p=5548#comment-969</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a dick! Don&#039;t worry, she&#039;ll be shilling for the New York Post in a couple years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a dick! Don&#8217;t worry, she&#8217;ll be shilling for the New York Post in a couple years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. Frank Daniels</title>
		<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/01/the-failed-shorty-qa-with-susannah-breslin-2/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>N. Frank Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therumpus.net/?p=5548#comment-650</guid>
		<description>In no way should you feel bad about &quot;blowing the interview.&quot; I thought those were great questions, regardless of whether or not she&#039;s already answered them in previous posts on her own blog. The point of a site is to get people interested in a particular artist, so it seems ridiculous that she would take offense to what you asked. I suppose that what happens to some people after they achieve some level of success. I guess I&#039;m not there yet, because in all the interviews I&#039;ve done I&#039;ve been asked the same questions numerous times. The point is to reveal yourself and your work to new audiences in every corner of the &#039;net. 

For what it&#039;s worth you can interview me any time. In fact I&#039;d welcome it. I hope you were being sarcastic about feeling bad. Youre better than that.

Talk soon.
~Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In no way should you feel bad about &#8220;blowing the interview.&#8221; I thought those were great questions, regardless of whether or not she&#8217;s already answered them in previous posts on her own blog. The point of a site is to get people interested in a particular artist, so it seems ridiculous that she would take offense to what you asked. I suppose that what happens to some people after they achieve some level of success. I guess I&#8217;m not there yet, because in all the interviews I&#8217;ve done I&#8217;ve been asked the same questions numerous times. The point is to reveal yourself and your work to new audiences in every corner of the &#8216;net. </p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth you can interview me any time. In fact I&#8217;d welcome it. I hope you were being sarcastic about feeling bad. Youre better than that.</p>
<p>Talk soon.<br />
~Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Radic</title>
		<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/01/the-failed-shorty-qa-with-susannah-breslin-2/comment-page-1/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Radic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therumpus.net/?p=5548#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Too bad.  I&#039;ve often wondered what it&#039;s like to be 6&#039;2&#039; tall, good-looking and controversial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad.  I&#8217;ve often wondered what it&#8217;s like to be 6&#8217;2&#8242; tall, good-looking and controversial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

