<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rumpus Interview with Earth Day Organizer Denis Hayes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therumpus.net/2009/04/the-rumpus-interview-with-denis-hayes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/04/the-rumpus-interview-with-denis-hayes/</link>
	<description>Books, Music, Movies, Art, Politics, Sex, Other</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:36:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/04/the-rumpus-interview-with-denis-hayes/comment-page-1/#comment-199832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therumpus.net/?p=15126#comment-199832</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to see no mention of eyesore wind turbines in this article, even though Mr. Hayes&#039; position on them may be different than mine.

Massive towers all over the landscape are a huge step backward in reducing the human footprint on nature. With wind power, there&#039;s been too much emphasis on carbon-reduction to the detriment of aesthetic values and wilderness preservation. The mere ability to see turbine installations from distant mountaintops (i.e. in National Parks) reduces the perception of a natural planet vs. one owned by Man.

Solar panels on existing man-made structures are far more frugal with acreage, and even when they&#039;re installed as &quot;farms&quot; they disrupt the horizon far less. Wind turbines invariably wreck areas that once looked natural. I think they only belong far out at sea, or mostly out of sight in minimal configurations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to see no mention of eyesore wind turbines in this article, even though Mr. Hayes&#8217; position on them may be different than mine.</p>
<p>Massive towers all over the landscape are a huge step backward in reducing the human footprint on nature. With wind power, there&#8217;s been too much emphasis on carbon-reduction to the detriment of aesthetic values and wilderness preservation. The mere ability to see turbine installations from distant mountaintops (i.e. in National Parks) reduces the perception of a natural planet vs. one owned by Man.</p>
<p>Solar panels on existing man-made structures are far more frugal with acreage, and even when they&#8217;re installed as &#8220;farms&#8221; they disrupt the horizon far less. Wind turbines invariably wreck areas that once looked natural. I think they only belong far out at sea, or mostly out of sight in minimal configurations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

