<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Eyeball #28: Movie Binge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://therumpus.net/2009/09/the-eyeball-28-movie-binge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/09/the-eyeball-28-movie-binge/</link>
	<description>Books, Music, Movies, Art, Politics, Sex, Other</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 05:58:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Moody</title>
		<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/09/the-eyeball-28-movie-binge/comment-page-1/#comment-12006</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Moody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therumpus.net/?p=32187#comment-12006</guid>
		<description>Ryan, that list of songs from Tarantino is just shocking! Shocking! Jason Mraz is everything that&#039;s wrong with music! However, instead of wasting time on that subject, I want briefly to attempt to rehabilitate Roy Orbison. It took me a long time to get it, to get him, but then I really got it, and the turning point, for me, was the &quot;In Dreams&quot; section of BLUE VELVET. Since you are a movie-drenched human, I suggest rewatching the sequence (it&#039;s the part where Dean Stockwell lipsynchs to Orbison). I had heard Orbison many times before (and I remember puzzling over Springsteen&#039;s obsession with him, when I heard &quot;Thunder Road&quot; for the first time in my teens), but when I saw this film, or when I was first bludgeoned by this film, I suddenly got the surrealism (and I mean the word literally) in what Orbison does. What&#039;s upsetting and fascinating about him is how much is going on underneath the spooky countertenor passages. It&#039;s all dark. Very very dark. And very vulnerable. A falsetto is meant to be angelic, of course, but often the guys who sang those lines, in doo wop, let&#039;s say, or in the Beach Boys, ended up being the darker scarier guys, as if to compensate, and that&#039;s sort of how I think about Orbison. The slightly unnatural voice is out of character for the material, and &quot;In Dreams&quot; is a good example. He doesn&#039;t mean, you know, romantic dreams. He means the violent, disjunctive chaos of real dreams, which is why Lynch used him in BLUE VELVET. I say go back and watch that passage, and then try listening to &quot;Running Scared,&quot; which has to be, by my lights, one of the very greatest early rock and roll singles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, that list of songs from Tarantino is just shocking! Shocking! Jason Mraz is everything that&#8217;s wrong with music! However, instead of wasting time on that subject, I want briefly to attempt to rehabilitate Roy Orbison. It took me a long time to get it, to get him, but then I really got it, and the turning point, for me, was the &#8220;In Dreams&#8221; section of BLUE VELVET. Since you are a movie-drenched human, I suggest rewatching the sequence (it&#8217;s the part where Dean Stockwell lipsynchs to Orbison). I had heard Orbison many times before (and I remember puzzling over Springsteen&#8217;s obsession with him, when I heard &#8220;Thunder Road&#8221; for the first time in my teens), but when I saw this film, or when I was first bludgeoned by this film, I suddenly got the surrealism (and I mean the word literally) in what Orbison does. What&#8217;s upsetting and fascinating about him is how much is going on underneath the spooky countertenor passages. It&#8217;s all dark. Very very dark. And very vulnerable. A falsetto is meant to be angelic, of course, but often the guys who sang those lines, in doo wop, let&#8217;s say, or in the Beach Boys, ended up being the darker scarier guys, as if to compensate, and that&#8217;s sort of how I think about Orbison. The slightly unnatural voice is out of character for the material, and &#8220;In Dreams&#8221; is a good example. He doesn&#8217;t mean, you know, romantic dreams. He means the violent, disjunctive chaos of real dreams, which is why Lynch used him in BLUE VELVET. I say go back and watch that passage, and then try listening to &#8220;Running Scared,&#8221; which has to be, by my lights, one of the very greatest early rock and roll singles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Boudinot</title>
		<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/09/the-eyeball-28-movie-binge/comment-page-1/#comment-9260</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Boudinot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therumpus.net/?p=32187#comment-9260</guid>
		<description>Gaia: You are absolutely right. Lousy fact checking on my part. Scott Favor it is. --Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gaia: You are absolutely right. Lousy fact checking on my part. Scott Favor it is. &#8211;Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaia</title>
		<link>http://therumpus.net/2009/09/the-eyeball-28-movie-binge/comment-page-1/#comment-9248</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 07:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://therumpus.net/?p=32187#comment-9248</guid>
		<description>Just a correction: Keanu Reeves&#039; castname in My Own Private Idaho was SCOTT FAVOR. It doesn&#039;t sound good using it wrong towards your students..... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a correction: Keanu Reeves&#8217; castname in My Own Private Idaho was SCOTT FAVOR. It doesn&#8217;t sound good using it wrong towards your students&#8230;.. <img src='http://therumpus.net/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

