»
«

SWINGING MODERN SOUNDS #19: One Recent Example of Talent

Rick Moody bio ↓  ·  January 21st, 2010  ·  filed under music, Rick Moody, rumpus original

Moody: Well, that’s an interesting reply, and it’s heading in the right direction. But my interpretation would go like this: I think the album as a whole is sort of set up by “Bedding Wells,” which has a fairy tale like aspect to it, or an old-folk-song like aspect to it, but one that is informed by a very explicit evocation of childhood sexuality that kind of has, as I hear it, an almost incestuous intensity to it. Of course the fantasy of brother/sister incest is as old as the hills in folkloric tradition, and is not terribly poisonous in that well of subconscious imagery, it’s almost quaint. But to me the fact of this theme points out how pure, and unedited, your instincts are. The rest of the album, though it doesn’t really take up these themes, uses this approach as a template, it seems to me, moving in an out of “realism” and in and out of a lyrical approach that has a much more “folkloric” quality to it. Which is one reason that the album, despite its very modern surface reminds me (of all things) of a pair of albums that almost no one listens to anymore (and even fewer people like), viz., Nursery Cryme and Foxtrot, by Genesis[1]. The “Supper’s Ready” modality of Peter Gabriel’s lyric writing is not at all unlike what you are doing,where in the surrealism and the childhood sexuality are strongly yoked together. Joanna Newsom is a recent example of a similar approach.

Another way at getting at the issue (the issue of “What exactly does Johanna mean?”) is to ask: Why all the spoonerisms? I find the tendency curious. Initially, one wants to read “Bedding Wells” as meaning exactly what it says (it’s about bedding well, not about wedding bells), but maybe you want more than that. Is it just play? Or is there more to it for you?

Warren: Wow. I definitely never expected to be compared to Genesis in this lifetime.

You are definitely on to something with the childhood sexuality analysis… I myself have often employed the word “incestuous” in reference to “Bedding Wells.” And there is certainly a recurrent romanticization of childhood throughout the album (most notably, I’d say, in “Birch Bark”). The innocence, imagination, and adventurousness of childhood is all very fertile ground for me.

The music box intro is important. As the first sound on the album, I wanted it to feel like you are opening an old dusty box full of secret letters and cherished trinkets, which the album will subsequently try to document. I never considered the connection between my band mates and my brothers… but I do certainly think of them as brothers, and Jonathan has often told me he considers me his little sister.

Another piece of evidence for your theory is the cover art, an antique photo of a young boy and a girl, possibly siblings, but it almost looks like they are posing for a wedding portrait. When I found that photograph I immediately thought it was a perfect illustration of “Bedding Wells.”

Moody: Why all the spoonerisms?

Warren: It is mostly playful, but I do love the alternate meanings that emerge. “Bedding Wells” is my favorite example, because as you pointed out, both meanings are extremely relevant to the song. This sort of goes back to my fondness for all things subconscious—I chose the spoonerisms I did for the surreal truth that emerges from them.

Moody: What’s with the rabbit ears you wear onstage in many of the live photos?

Warren: Long ago, Jonathan once referred to our recording process as “a bunny with cyborg implants”—i.e. the bare-bones acoustic/vocal framework is a sweet li’l bunny, into which we implant robot parts. But come to think of it, I started wearing the ears before I had a band, when I was just playing at open mics and what not. They were a good luck charm I guess. They make me less scared to play in front of people. Less naked.

Moody: Can I persuade you not to use the promo photo of you half in a garbage can—for feminist reasons?

Warren: I’ll think about it. While I admit I had not considered the feminist implications, I’m not convinced that it’s necessarily derogatory. I once read an essay claiming that Madonna’s music video, “Open Your Heart,” in which she is a stripper in a peep show, has this empowering  feminist message because it emphasizes the “play” of gender roles. Hmmm…

Moody: What does the band name mean to you?

Warren: Well, I already know you’re not going to buy it when I say, “It doesn’t mean anything.” But… it doesn’t mean anything.

Moody: You’re right, I don’t buy it. Can you further describe your approach to playing live now?

Warren: It’s a four-piece band with Jim Bertini on drums, Jonathan Nocera on electric guitar, and Chris St. Hillaire on bass. For live shows we’ve added drums and bass to a few songs that don’t have them on the album. Then on songs without drums and bass, Chris and Jim take on a variety of odd jobs like glockenspiel, second guitar parts, bell-ringing, music boxes (we open “
“Bedding Wells” with a small army of music boxes). “Birch Bark” is the only one I do solo.

Moody: What’s next for the band?

swinging modern soundsWarren: After I graduate, I plan on making the band my number one priority… I’ve been doing this crazy juggling act of music and academia for two years, so I’m definitely looking forward to being able to devote my full attention to it. That said, we’ve been doing alright given our circumstances… so for now, we’ll just keep doing what we’ve been doing.  I’ve already got quite a bit of material for the next album, and we want to start playing live more now that we’re sounding tight as a band.

Moody: And why Spanish translation?

Warren: I was going to be a painting major, but I realized that painting and music are both things in which I am pretty self-motivated. I wanted to do something in college that I wouldn’t be doing on my own anyway. I started taking Spanish classes at Bard and really fell in love with the language and literature. I am completely obsessed with translation—it is an endlessly fascinating art form. I’ve translated a few of my songs into Spanish…. so I’m ready for international superstardom.
__________________________________________________________________________
[1] Yes, the author understands that this was about the least cool possible thing to say, and leaves it in the spirit of fidelity to journalistic truth.

***

All photos by Jenny Brover.

Pages: 1 2 3

Read the whole article on one page

Related Posts

  • No related posts...
···
Rick Moody's newest novel is THE FOUR FINGERS OF DEATH, from Little, Brown. He has a new solo album out, called THE DARKNESS IS GOOD, released on Dainty Rubbish Records. Moody also plays music with The Wingdale Community Singers, whose recently released album is called SPIRIT DUPLICATOR. Both albums are available at Amazon, iTunes, and CDBaby.com. More from this author →

5 Responses to “SWINGING MODERN SOUNDS #19: One Recent Example of Talent”

  1. John Kwok Says:

    Have found Rick’s musings always fascinating and often profound, especially since he is both a first-class folk musician and, without question, among our finest writers (Rick, I think this needs to be said, only because there are more than a few who think that you are a mere dilettante with respect to music.).

  2. Brian Spears Says:

    Just wanted to say that I checked this album out via emusic based on this review/interview and really enjoyed it on the first listen. I’ll be running this one around for a while, I think.

  3. Jim Says:

    “Song writing has such vast possibilities as an art form, but our brains are so bombarded with the normative verse/chorus/bridge form that it becomes difficult to think outside of those limitations.”

    Totally in agreement. One of the things I like about this album is that the verse/chorus/verse/chorus formula is obviously avoided, but most of the arrangements are tight enough that they don’t feel ‘epic’. Epic is a good thing, but too much of it can be exhausting.

  4. Rick Moody Says:

    I should report, by way of addendum, that I went to the sTickLipS show at Cameo on Friday night, just past. I sort of expected, frankly, that there was no way that this band was going to be a “band,” which is to say there should have been no way that they really thought like a group entity, for being so young and having played out so few times. I assumed, based on the foregoing, that they were a studio creation. I am very pleased to say, therefore, that they were ridiculously tight, capable of turning on a dime, and shockingly confident too. I think maybe you can ONLY be this confident if you have played on the road for ten years, or if you are 21. It is a wholly admirable confidence. They leaned on the numbers from the album that use bass and drums, because now there is a genuine rhythm section, and Jo was a very passionate and moving lead singer. All in all, the live edition was somehow BETTER than the studio edition, because there were no gimmicks really, just some very strong playing, and a real commitment to the songs. I think, even more so now, that this is a band to watch.

  5. Chris Warren Says:

    A sad follow-up: Jonathan Nocera, Sticklips’ electric guitarist/producer, passed away this week after a long illness. Here’s part of the notice from the band’s Facebook page:
    “While Sticklips will never be the same, JP will be with us always as a guiding light and an endless spring of inspiration.

    “Our second album, which will be completed this fall, will be a monument to JP’s life and will devoutly follow his final instructions for the future of our music: “Keep it weird.”

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.