Rumpus Columns

Ryan Boudinot

January 18th, 2010

The Eyeball #31: The Baader Meinhof Complex

On New Year’s Day this year I removed all the bookmarks from my Firefox bookmarks bar. When I mentioned to a couple friends that my resolution was to lay off the political blogs, I got variations on the same response: Yeah, that’s a pretty popular resolution right now. My resolution hasn’t worked out all that well; instead of clicking links I simply type andrewsullivan.com into my browser window to maintain my daily outrage level. I worry that I’m addicted to incredulity, that for some twisted reason I need to seek out the tawdriest filth erupting from the mouths of the Limbaughs and Becks and Palins of the world in order to define myself in opposition. …more

November 25th, 2009

The Eyeball #30: Introducing a Child to Star Wars

I’ve written about watching movies with my children in this column, about introducing my son Miles to the films of Ray Harryhausen and watching him vomit during a viewing of E.T.. Having an amateur’s enthusiasm for films that span the history of cinema, I’m determined to provide my kids with a young cinephile’s education, steering them to Miyazaki and Melies and away from, say, The Backyardigans. …more

October 14th, 2009

The Eyeball #29: Oscilloscope Laboratories, Dear Zachary

gunnin_posterSure, I like the Beastie Boys as much as any dude of my vintage, having heeded the call to fight for my right to party as a junior high school student then asked to check my head as a college student living in a house called the Punk Rock Pagoda during the peak years of grunge. …more

September 11th, 2009

The Eyeball #28: Movie Binge

My family was recently out of town for a five days, leaving me home alone with over 800 pages (no exaggeration) of student work to read and comment upon. My reward for getting through a day of writing about free indirect style and character arcs was to watch a lot of movies, both in the theater and at home, cranked up loud on the home system and with a fuckin’ beer in my hand. Here’s how those five days went.

Saturday:
Inglourious Basterds. BasterdsBy now you’ve probably read lots of commentary on Tarantino’s latest. My two cents is that I could listen to those characters talk all night. It felt like a 5-hour movie in a 2 1/2 hour movie’s body and I wanted it to go on and on. A few weeks ago I happened upon a Sirius/XM radio broadcast in which Tarantino guest-deejayed. He played songs that he’d listened to while making Basterds. Here’s the complete set list.

Wu Tang Clan, “The Rulez”
KT Tunstall, “Hold On”
Bob Dylan, “Political World”
Barbra Streisand, “Stony End”
Robin McNamara, “Lay A Little Lovin’ On Me”
Sir Douglas Quintet, “Mendocino”
David Bowie, “Cat People (Putting Out Fire)” – from Bowie’s Greatest Hits (not Cat People Sdtrk)
Jay Z, “S. Carter”
Roy Orbison, “There Won’t Be Many Coming Home”
Jason Mraz, “I’m Yours (Acoustic)”
Maroon 5, “Wake Up Call”
Steve Poltz, “Waterfalls”
Britney Spears, “My Prerogative”

I happened to tune in at the end of the Roy Orbison tune. I can respect people who like Roy Orbison, though to me he was always little more than an immobile wax dummy who occasionally purred. Wow, rock and roll, man. As someone who lived off the Pulp Fiction soundtrack for years, I am, like a lot of people I suppose, inclined to give Quentin Tarantino the benefit of the doubt when it comes to music. But there’s really no other way to say what I felt except that I thought his playlist sucked. That “Waterfalls” song is an acoustic cover of the TLC hit from the mid-nineties. I’m going to stop writing about this now because it’s starting to make me upset.

Sunday:

Waltz with Bashir. Waltz with BashirAnimation is a great medium in which to explore the elasticity of memory. And even though both Basterds and Bashir are both about war, I think it’s fair to say that only the former one is a cartoon. Waltz with Bashir was a sobering plunge into repressed memories of war, and of the strange juxtapositions of cultures in wartime. Amid animated sequences of bombings and ambushes, the voice of John Lydon suddenly erupted on the soundtrack, singing “This Is Not a Love Song” from his PiL days.

Paprika. PaprikaAnother animated feature, this one from director Satoshi Kon, based on a story by–I didn’t realize this upon renting it–Yasutaka Tsutsui, whose story collection Salmonella Men on Planet Porno I picked up not long ago. While Bashir uses animation to illustrate untrustworthy memories, Paprika seeks to do the same with dreams. There’s so much crammed into the frame with this film, my favorite sequences being a procession of animals and objects marching along through various characters’ subconscious minds.

Monday:
The Holy Mountain, by Alejandro Jodorowsky. Holy Mountain stillsI’ve blogged about this film before, and about Jodorowsky in general. For my second viewing of this film I invited my old friend Nate over. We drank Corona and tequila and kept an armchair commentary going through the Chilean auteur’s steady unveiling of wonders. I was impressed again by how ballsy the film is. In my head I’ve been attempting to reverse engineer the directions Jodorowsky must have given his crew. Like, “I want the amputees dressed like Roman soldiers to assemble in the Jesus factory.” Or, “Let’s make sure each toad has a firecracker under it.” Or, “Let’s get some climbing gear for the prostitute and her chimpanzee.”

Tuesday: Death Proof, by Quentin Tarantino. This was the only Tarantino film I hadn’t seen. So I watched it. It was cool, whatever. Great car chase at the end, one of the best I think I’ve ever seen. The bonus features are worth checking out, particularly the featurettes on the stunts and those who performed them.

Wednesday: A Scanner Darkly. My animation streak continued with Richard Linklater’s rotoscoped adaptation of Philip K. Dick’s paranoid drug novel. I think this movie helped me figure out what the problem is with Keanu Reeves. scanner darklyIn any movie in which he’s required to get all fired up he ends up looking ridiculous. He is not an actor made for big, hysterical speeches. That actor would be John Malkovich. What Keanu does best is simmer and lope through a movie. I’m thinking of his great performance as Scott Fortune in My Own Private Idaho, which he’s never matched in my book.

Man on Wire: My five-day movie binge came to an end with this documentary about Phillipe Petit, that French dude who crossed the chasm between the World Trade Center towers on a tight rope. Completely riveting and unexpectedly emotional, and the perfect note with which to end five days of student fiction and movies.

August 10th, 2009

The Eyeball #27: Apocalypse Now Redux

765382047_44c358b5f0_m“The purpose of war is to kill as many of the enemy’s civilians as you can until they surrender.” –Col. John Harbert

John Harbert was my grandfather, my hero, a veteran of World War II, Korea, and Vietnam. …more

August 2nd, 2009

The Eyeball #26: Three Films by Alejandro Jodorowsky

In the past couple years whenever anyone has asked for a movie recommendation, I steer them in the direction of Alejandro Jodorowsky. …more

July 14th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Vicky Cristina Barcelona

When you grow up being called a faggot by farm boys because you like to read books, Woody Allen can appear as something of a savior. That’s my story, anyway. Allen’s early films with their broad appeal mean that even small town video rental stores are obliged to carry his work, shelving Interiors beside Bananas in the comedy section.

Woody Allen

Woody Allen

When I was in high school, I subjected potential girlfriends to something of a test, seeing how they reacted to Take the Money and Run. None found it nearly as amusing as I did, and predictably my high school romances were fraught in disappointment. It was only when I got to college, when my future wife and I cried at the end of Annie Hall that I felt I’d found true love.

The other night I finally slipped in a months-old Netflix copy of Vicky Cristina Barcelona, the story of two American beauties abroad. Within the first twenty minutes I resisted the film, thinking I am not in the mood to watch a movie about people who don’t have to worry about paying bills. Perhaps it’s my persistent shame at being relatively untraveled, but I wasn’t all that compelled to follow the romantic intrigues of people who float through Europe on the wings of their charmed life. The characters who do have jobs in these film are shallow, khaki-wearing business schmucks, men ever cognizant of one another’s golf handicaps and bewildered by abstract art. Javier Bardem appears as a chunk of confident sexuality, an artist–of course–whose seduction of Scarlett Johansson’s and Rebecca Hall’s title characters cuts right to the subtext of romantic comedies in general. We just want the characters to get it on.

Vicky Cristina Barcelona rubbed me the wrong way, I guess. I wasn’t in the frame of mind to accept escapist entertainment on its own terms, which is unusual for me. After all, recently I’ve been perfectly willing to accept the snappy breeziness of Preston Sturges.

I suppose I expect a lot from Woody Allen, while recognizing it’s his prerogative to make a light, enjoyable comedy. It was Allen’s films that suggested to me that the life of the mind might be something a kid like me could aspire to, and Allen’s bespectacled and frizzy-haired presence at the center of those early comedies was a balm to my adolescent anxieties. The post-coital chatter of those films was titilating in a way that a sex scene never could be, implying that by sheer force of wit and intelligence a physically inadequate guy could get a woman to fall in love with him. That’s heady stuff when you’re 14 years old and have never made a basket in a basketball game.

Even in the films in which Allen’s presence isn’t in front of the camera, he tends to make an appearance anyway, as with Kenneth Branagh’s channeling of Allen’s neurotic tics in 1998’s Celebrity can attest. My guess is, based on Match Point and now Vicky Cristina Barcelona, Allen just isn’t interested in directing proxies of himself right now. (I have yet to see the new film with what’s-his-name from that one show, uh, Larry David, who looks like a Woody proxy if there ever was one.) Which is wonderful and opens up a whole new period for his genius. I wonder, though, if the result of this approach is that these films feel more like a product of Allen’s head than his heart.

July 9th, 2009

THE EYEBALL, The Rumpus DVD Column: #24 Nicolas Roeg’s First Five Films

PerformanceYears ago I happened upon a series of arresting images on cable. There was a young Mick Jagger cavorting in a bath tub with two svelte beauties. A child wearing a fake mustache. A still image of Jorge Luis Borges rising out of a gunshot wound to the head. …more

July 3rd, 2009

THE EYEBALL: There Will Be Blood

Sometimes I just want an actor to take a movie by the fuckin’ balls. I’m thinking of Benicio del Toro in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas or Jack Nicholson in The Shining. Add to that rogue’s gallery of scenery chewers Daniel Day Lewis in There Will Be Blood. Just look at this shit:

Apologies for the piracy-o-vision, but still, damn.

I just watched the DVD of this film for which Daniel Day Lewis (I can’t bring myself to just refer to him as “Lewis”) earned a Best Actor Oscar. The disc comes with no commentary, but there’s a period documentary about the oil business in California for all you petroleum history nerds.

And now, ladies and gentlemen, watch this clip of Daniel Day Lewis in 1985’s My Beautiful Laundrette, his first film, in which he provides Vanilla Ice with his future look.

June 20th, 2009

THE EYEBALL, The Rumpus DVD Column: Synecdoche, New York

These movies pass through our lives, take up two hours of our time, and go along their merry way. Recently I enjoyed Preston Sturges’s The Lady Eve, Orson Welles’s masterful Touch of Evil, and a collection of Pixar shorts. I watched E.T. with my son and was surprised at how dark that movie was. And at the very moment when the scary astronaut guys apply the defib paddles to E.T.’s lumpy animatronic chest, Miles vomited on the floor. I’m still trying to figure out whether he had the stomach flu or was making his first foray into film criticism.
While watching these films, one question kept intruding into my thoughts: Should I blog about this? I thought about blogging about Sturges’s romantic comedy and my fledgling theory about how all romantic comedies are about the conflict between honesty and intimacy. I considered commenting on how Pixar, from the very beginning, has wed ancient storytelling skills with technological advances. And I had a whole riff in my head about how the most unconvincing Mexican in all of cinema was played by Charlton Heston. But none of these films lingered in my consciousness for days after like Charlie Kaufman’s Synecdoche, New York.

I watched Synecdoche in the theater on my birthday last November, catching a 10 PM showing. Stumbling into midnight after that movie was one of those rare, disorienting experiences in which the world outside the movie seems to have been subtly changed, like the time I went to Costco right after watching David Lynch’s Lost Highway and felt like I’d landed on the fucking moon. Or my first Kaufman encounter, walking into a Kenneth Cole after seeing Being John Malkovich and being physically unable to remove the grin on my face for at least half an hour.

I knew Synecdoche was the kind of movie one has a lasting relationship with. So I’m happy to say my second date with the film was better than the first. I bought the DVD, watched the film, the awkward on-stage interview with Kaufman (awkward because the interviewer asked lame questions), the interview with Philip Seymour Hoffman, and a blogger’s roundtable discussion filmed in someone’s book-lined apartment.

One of the bloggers in the featurette–can’t remember who–made an interesting point that upon repeat viewings of this film, he/she tends to focus on one scene. For me, the scene I mulled over the most was the one in which Caden Cotard (Hoffman) and his adult daughter Olive (Robin Weigert) attempt to resolve their estrangement at her deathbed. Olive has been living in Germany, where she became famous as a 10-year-old with a full body tattoo, an attribute she later used to her advantage as an exotic dancer. She demands that they speak to each other through headset translators, with her speaking in German while Caden responds in English. She reveals that her much-older lover Maria and her mother Adele told her that Caden left her so that he could have anal sex with his lover Eric. The charge is patently ridiculous, but it’s the explanation that Olive holds on to. She demands that Caden ask for her forgiveness. Caden, at first denying the accusation, changes his mind and asks her to forgive something he never even did. Olive then refuses, and the refusal causes both of them to weep bitterly. Olive dies, and a petal of one of her tattoo roses withers and falls off her arm.

What the fuck is going on here? Consider another film in which Hoffman made an appearance, Paul Thomas Anderson’s Magnolia, which came out in 1999, the same year as Being John Malkovich. In Magnolia Hoffman plays a more or less well-adjusted character, a hospice nurse tasked with caring for an old man played by Jason Robards, in his final role. Tom Cruise, in his best role (which some might say isn’t saying much) plays Robard’s character’s estranged son. At the deathbed there are tears, there are recriminations, there are open wounds. We pass through that scene knowing what is being felt and how we’re supposed to feel. We’re being instructed on how to feel as we’re feeling it.

Philip Seymour Hoffman, feeling much better now, thank you.

Philip Seymour Hoffman, feeling much better now, thank you.

But in the Synecdoche death bed scene, our emotional frame of reference is shifting under our feet. At one moment we snicker at the accusation that Hoffman was off having anal sex with his fictitous lover Eric, at another moment we yearn that these characters will re-establish their love, but then brutally we are denied. This father and daughter are beyond reconciliation. Even though Olive wants to forgive, she doesn’t have the capacity to do so, perhaps due to the fact Caden wasn’t around to teach her how.

Is that it? Maybe? I am still confused by the scene. And I’m sure that the next time I watch it, Synecdoche will yield another puzzle.

The movie has lost money in the box office and is likely considered a failure by the people at Sony Pictures Classics whose job it is to count beans. A creative writing student of mine who is a movie producer once said that the only reason good movies get made is that there are still people in Hollywood who have both money and good taste. I can only hope that Kaufman has the backing he needs to keep giving us these generous, hard-won gifts that we’ll be watching  a hundred years from now.

May 29th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: This was, is, and will be Spinal Tap

spinal-tapI recently read on some blog somewhere in the bloggy blog blogosphere a reference to certain movies as “wallpaper.” …more

May 17th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Illusions

Remember when The Illusionist and The Prestige both vied to be the winter 2007 movie about magicians? No? Anyway, transport yourself back to those fabled days of January and February 2007. I know what you’re thinking. You were too busy obsessing over the surprising resignation of Kazakhstan’s Prime Minister Daniyal Akhmetov and Japan’s incineration of over 10,000 chickens to battle the bird flu to concern yourself with a magician movie-off. And oh how we trembled at the inevitable Giuliani presidency!

The Illusionist is well worth checking out if you missed it, if only for the comfort food presence of Paul Giamatti. Watching Giamatti is like going to a fancy restaurant and ordering the macaroni and cheese. You know it’s just mac and cheese, but damn what do they put in this stuff to make it taste so good? I declared Giamatti my favorite contemporary actor not after Sideways or American Splendor or even Fred Claus but after his starring role in John Adams. The guy can act, and by act I mean he can yell, indignantly and with eyes popping out. And then there’s the aw-shucks Giamatti moment, the I am having a dawning realization facial slackness that makes you notice the pair of cheeks this guy has, and you just want to grab onto those cheeks and say, “Who’s my favorite actor? Who? Who?”

In The Illusionist Giamatti gets to play a chief inspector tasked with maintaining the aristocratic order of things in Victorian-era Vienna. Seems there’s this love triange a-brewing among an illusionist named Eisenheim (Edward Norton), his once-childhood sweetheart now duchess Sophie (Jessica Biel), and a Disney-level asshole of a Crown Prince played from behind a mustache by Rufus Sewell. Immediately we want Eisenheim and Sophie to fulfill the promise of their love, the Crown Prince to receive his comeuppance, and the chief inspector to frustratedly bark something at the other characters. This movie does not disappoint in this regard.
Paul Giamatti

The film takes as its subject the various ways Eisenheim fools his audience’s perceptions and refuses to reveal the secrets of his tricks. This subject matter is mirrored in the gradual delivery of the film’s dramatic elements. We’re led to believe one thing, but by the end all is revealed as an elaborate ruse, and Paul Giamatti once again gets to jerk his head and smile in that incredibly impressed, well-wouldn’t-you-know-it kind of way he does so well. In the last minutes of the movie we’re shown the “trick” that was played on us, the audience, and how not everything was what it seemed.

Usually, this kind of thing really pisses me off. The more I think about the George Clooney Ocean movies, the more I hate them. They’re really meta-movies more than anything. Ask anyone exiting the theater after one of those Ocean movies what Matt Damon’s character’s name was. Or Brad Pitt’s. See? You don’t even know and you’ve seen all three of those celebrity fests. You can easily describe the plot as, “George Clooney and Brad Pitt plot to steal a lot of money from a casino” and no one will be taken aback. No one will challenge you by saying, “Surely Brad Pitt and George Clooney don’t play themselves.”

But what grates more than the starfuck machinery of those movies is how in the last few minutes, we’re finally privy to all sorts of stuff that was happening off-camera while we were otherwise chuckling at the irascibility of the ever-swelling cast. Oh, so they found a way to dress up as a SWAT team to infiltrate the casino. Oh, so there was all this other shit going down that we weren’t in on.

I think of this as the Scooby Doo method of storytelling, where the audience isn’t privy to the actual plot until the very end and it’s revealed the werewolf was the amusement park caretaker the whole time. I nail my creative writing MFA students on this kind of thing, this holding back of important information out of the mistaken belief that not knowing will pull an audience along.

For a counter-example, look no further than Jules Dassin’s 1956 noir Rififi. At the heart of this jewel caper is a 30-minute sequence of zero dialogue in which the thieves carry out their heist. We get to see the planning and execution of the crime in intimate detail, and the effect is riveting. Rather than “spoil” the mystery, such procedural minutiae makes us, the audience, participants in it. Dassin didn’t underestimate our intelligence, but Soderbergh sure seems to.

Which makes Neil Burger’s The Ilusionist all the more complicated, because the movie is about information that is left out, unrevealed. I am willing to excuse the last-reel Scooby Doo revelations of this 2007 sleeper for that reason. Sometimes it is fun to get tricked.

May 11th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Shorties

Hey Eyeballers. I haven’t had the patience to watch anything over an hour long recently. I take that back. I watched Babe with my son a couple weekends ago and as always got choked up at the end. I am a total sucker for talking swine who defy expectations.

All my indie cred just went right out the fuckin’ window.

The filmed entertainment I’ve been thinking about most is a short piece, some would call it a “music video” by the band Matt & Kim. It’s them getting naked in Times Square, with all their controversial bits blurred out. It’s not really their nudity that makes this video so compelling so much as their expressions once they’ve disrobed and are staring up in awe at the lights and jumbotrons. These could be the expressions of our homo erectus ancestors had they ever invented a time machine to transport themselves to 21st century New York City. Plus, I like the song.

Another little movie I stumbled across today was this little gem. Also starring a couple, also featuring a 360 camera shot, but fully clothed.

Stop Motion | The Long Haul from DUMAIS on Vimeo.

April 23rd, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Rashomon

One weird symptom of watching old movies, for me at least, is that I find myself imagining what the original audiences thought of them. I suppose this goes back to the anecdotes I’ve heard about The Great Train Robbery (1904), which caused viewers to dive under their seats when a bandit points his gun at the camera. The history of cinema is one in which we’re surprised by new vocabularies, then come to understand them to the point where we can mock them with a self-congratulatory sense of ironic remove. Take the Scary Movie franchise, or all those other movies with “Movie” in the title, like this really painful one I suffered through once called Date Movie. The humor of those things arises from our ability to decipher the codes. In Not Another Teen Movie, for instance, there’s a gag about how after a teen makes some sort of emotionally risky public pronouncement, they’re met with a “slow clap” from the crowd.

What were Japanese audiences thinking when they sat down in 1950 to watch Akira Kurosawa’s Rashomon for the first time? How did the film resonate for a culture grappling with the aftershocks of wartime propaganda? Now “Rashomon” is simply short-hand for multiple characters telling a story from contradictory points of view. In Kurosawa’s adaptation of a couple stories by Ryunosuke Akutagawa, we’re treated to the pleasant experience of having the narrative rug pulled out from under us over and over again. We see multiple versions of a single event, a rape and murder in the woods of some indistinct, samurai-era Japan. Before an unseen and unspeaking interogator, the bandit, the rape victim, and (via a medium) the dead husband recount their versions of this horrific event. It’s this last version that made me sit up. Kurosawa does something crazy with the audio here, having his genuinely spooky medium character deliver the dead man’s testimony in the form of a low-fi overdub. Truly freaky.

Rashomon, man. Rashomon.

Rashomon, man. Rashomon.


I’ve also got to say that Rashomon made me once again fall in love with the Akira Kurosawa players, so to speak. There’s Toshiro Mifune, of course, as the bandit Tajômaru, cackling to the point of red-lining the EQ. Mifune’s Seven Samurai compadre Takashi Shimura plays the woodcutter whose mind has been thoroughly blown by all the shit that went down. And Daisuke Katô, man. That guy reminds me of John Belushi. I thought he was the best part of Yojimbo, too.

So what did early audiences of Kurosawa’s film think when the film ended and they stumbled out into the Tokyo night? It’s really the textbook example of unreliable narration. Could Tarantino have been thinking about Rashomon when he directed the scenes in Reservoir Dogs in which Mr. Orange narrates flashbacks in which he simultaneously appears? Are all narrators suspect now? Was Ken Kwapis, who’s directed several episodes of The Office thinking of Rashomon when he delivered 1991’s Kevin Bacon/Elizabeth Perkins vehicle He Said, She Said? Will we ever know?

April 10th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Nude Caboose

Yesterday I had the pleasure of interviewing Guy Maddin, the great Canadian auteur and subject of previous Eyeball posts. We spoke for about an hour and a half; he was so generous and real that I ended up just wanting to be his friend forever. Man crush! I’ll post something when the interview appears in the magazine it’s slated to appear in, but for now I thought I’d mention one of Maddin’s short films, Nude Caboose, shot entirely on a cell phone. According to Maddin, the “director-approved” version is scored by Xavier Cugat’s version of the Zorba the Greek theme, but whenever this version is posted on YouTube, Charo (yes, Charo) has it taken down. So this version will have to suffice. Guy said that the filming of this delightful little short involved him chasing around a bare-assed woman with a cell phone, and that it didn’t resemble a film-making process in any shape or form. A quick warning here–if you can’t view bare butts at the office, the following is NSFW:

March 27th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Pig Hunt and Lost Season 4

Tuesday night I had the pleasure of reading a short story at therumpus.net’s Seattle launch party, prior to a screening of the film Pig Hunt. Director Jim Isaac served up guns, blood, taxidermy, boobs, motor bikes, hippies, wild boars, and weed, and what’s not to love about that? What intrigued me most was the involvement of musician Les Claypool, who plays a murderous redneck priest, carrying around a sort of crossbow shaped like a crucifix. He provided the soundtrack as well, which pulled me away from the film a bit as I recalled Primus shows I’ve seen. I guess I’ve seen them three times. The first time opening for Jane’s Addiction on the Ritual de lo Habitual tour, the second at Lollapalooza, the third headlining at the Paramount in Seattle. There was a time when Primus impressed me, when the number of notes a bass player could cram into a nanosecond seemed the true measure of an artist. Their set opening for Jane’s Addiction blew my high school-aged mind and I rushed out to buy their debut disc the next day. A friend of mine embraced Primus with a ferocity that seemed to increase in proportion to the level of cannabis he consumed.

After the movie, I hopped on a red-eye from Seattle to JFK, then to a connecting flight to Burlington, Vermont (I’m currently teaching at a residency at Goddard College). I intended to sleep on the flight, but instead consumed five straight episodes of Lost Season 4 on my laptop. Confined to a window seat I curled into a chiropractic nightmare for the duration of the flight, injecting this show into my brain. I can’t say it was the most pleasurable way to enjoy Lost, but I am addicted to the show.

That the quality of television has gotten better is a fairly common perception, and I’d attribute this to the very thing that was suppsosedly going to make television shittier–cable. When Bruce Springsteen sang a song in (I think) the late ’80s about “52 channels and nothing on,” many assumed that the proliferation of niche cable networks was going to exponentially spread the already shitty content being slopped out of the big three networks. Perhaps its this very proliferation that has forced networks to concentrate on the one thing that can build a loyal audience–quality writing. While Lost is of a different genus than, say, 2666, I appreciate the way its writers have mastered the art of the story arc. Watching Lost to me is like a car enthusiast looking under the hood of an expertly restored muscle car. I enjoy seeing where the pipes go, how the wires connect, how the flash-forwards hint at developments several episodes down the line.

The crazy thing about writing for television is that the writers have to build in pauses for commercials.  A friend of mine who used to write for shows like Melrose Place (which became something of a tradition for me and my friends in college) has tried to explain the mechanics of beats and pacing and arcs and 45-minute stories to me, and it strikes me as a hyper-disciplined, difficult craft to master. But what happens when a TV show, whose very reason for being is to provide a venue for marketing products to consumers, is stripped of those commercial pauses? The story still has to accomodate those intervals where a commercial for fabric softener would go, but freed from that responsibility the show becomes a process of constant conflict and resolution. The screen goes black for a second just as a new crisis arises–a crisis specifically intended to keep us watching through the commericals. But on DVD, with no commericals to watch, the experience is concentrated, intensified. And since an episode without commericals is only 45 minutes long, it’s not hard to convince one’s self to watch just one more episode.

And now I’m going to quit blogging and go do just that.


February 28th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Brazil

Yesterday I got laid off from my day job at a tech company. This got me thinking about an unpublished essay I wrote a couple years ago about my relationship to the Terry Gilliam film Brazil. Here it is. –Ryan

Terry Gilliam’s Brazil

I woke in the theater to the sound of my own snoring. It was past midnight in the year 2000, and from the projection booth came a stream of light that struck the screen to form Brazil, the 1985 movie by Terry Gilliam. This was the Eqyptian Theater, down the street from my apartment in Seattle, half full of shadowy figures attending a midnight showing. Somewhere around the halfway mark I had fallen asleep, and woke again toward the film’s end with the snoring trick I’d taught myself in college lecture halls. On screen, Sam Lowry, played by Jonathan Pryce, had infiltrated the Ministry of Information hoping to get closer to the truth behind the vast and cruel bureaucracy that keeps him from his dream of true love. Suddenly panicking that I had annoyed the rest of the audience with my honking, I slipped out the exit and into the night. I didn’t need to see how the movie turned out; I had watched it before, many times, on video when I was in high school and college, and on the Criterion Collection DVD boxed set, a recent splurge purchase. More than that, though, I had begun to live in it.

I was introduced to Brazil when I was 12 through Starlog, a science fiction magazine I occasionally picked up at the grocery store. Amid articles on the newest products of the Star Trek franchise were stills from Gilliam’s film, which looked nothing like my definition of scifi. In one, Jonathan Pryce appeared to be humping a desk. In another, in the guise of a metallic angel, he battled a gigantic samurai. I sought the movie in my hometown at Video Depot, locating the tape amid the perplexing Emmanuelle titles in the “Foreign” section. I remember mostly a surface amusement of the film on my first viewing. The woman whose face turns to a pliable putty, the strange workers who get bent out of shape about something as silly as duct repair. Brazil appeared to take place both in the future and some strange parallel version of the 1950s. I believe I fell asleep watching it the first time, too.

A few years later, in high school, I was lucky to fall under the influence of a history and philosophy teacher named Dave Cornelius, a Vietnam veteran who also owned Easton’s Books, my home town’s used bookstore. Dave had a poster of Brazil on the wall behind his desk, next to a poster of Bob Dylan. He had a reputation for being the most intellectual teacher at Mount Vernon High, a guy who somehow got away with occasionally dropping the f-word in class. In between history assignments I gave him some of my shitty poems, hoping for feedback. One afternoon he called me to his desk at the end of class.

“You don’t belong in high school,” he said, “You belong in a cafe in San Francisco, smoking pot and talking about poetry.”

My education commenced. I traded my Stephen King hardbacks at Easton’s for City Lights chapbooks and Jerzy Kozinski novels. On Sundays, when the store was officially closed but when Dave did much of his restocking and shelving, I dropped by for coffee and long conversations. While serving in Vietnam, Dave had kept himself sane with Dylan and regular shipments of classic literature sent by a group of women from a church somewhere stateside. He’d read all of Dostoevsky while overseas, and had developed a love for philosophy, particularly Heidegger and Kierkegaard. After I read The Metamorphosis I told him how much I loved Kafka. Dave ripped into me. “Don’t read The Metamorphosis and tell me you love Kafka. You don’t have a right to say you love Kafka after reading one novella. Read ‘In the Penal Colony.’ Read The Trial. Read The Castle. Then tell me what you think about Kafka.”

I was a slightly above average student who never took the coursework too seriously. In Dave’s classes he and I had an unspoken understanding that the assignments were beside the point and that we’d pursue a curriculum based on our own mutual interests. Having become accustomed to blanket praise from my English teachers, I was shocked and provoked when he called bullshit on some of my stories and poems. But I’d never had a champion like Dave Cornelius, who, after my poem about a masturbating George H.W. Bush made it into Xeroxed punk fanzine from Brooklyn, yelled down the hall, “Hey, there’s a published writer!”

Dave’s enthusiasm for Brazil intrigued me. He claimed as his favorite movie. I’m sure spending twenty years in the Mount Vernon School District had given him some hard experience in bureaucratic absurdity, and I imagine his mind had at times felt stultified in the faculty lounge. In his bookstore full of Hegel, Babel, Schulz, and Leibniz, my mentor was a Sam Lowry, too.

***

The Evergreen State College, in the throes of the grunge years. I lived in a six-man apartment on campus, with a communal kitchen, one of the worst architectural blunders a college can make. Get half a dozen twenty year-old guys in an apartment with a kitchen and it will soon be transformed into a bio-weapons lab. Here’s an experiment: take a beer bottle with an inch of beer left in it and leave on the counter for a month. Quickly, the beer will attract fruit flies, who will imbibe, pass out, and die in the bottle. Over time there forms a thick, black layer of fruit fly corpse scum. Or consider a loaf of bread in a plastic bag. Did you realize that this household item can actually generate heat? Just let it turn entirely to mold, then observe as it composts. Quick Tip: Using Elmer’s Glue to adhere beer bottle labels to the refrigerator door for your “art project” is not as sensible as using rubber cement, which doesn’t ruin the enamel when you attempt to peel the labels off at the end of the year, hoping to earn back your damage deposit. Here’s a household suggestion for those who can’t afford a white board and dry erase marker. Just use cooked spaghetti instead and apply it directly to the wall. Spell out messages to your friends. For instance: Fuck You.

The TV set in our apartment was tiny and occupied one of the chairs we would have sat in had we behaved like those students in the college catalog. Instead, sitting and gathering for a communal event like watching a movie involved moving piles of shit–like the industrial fan one of us stole from a Taco Bell construction site–from one part of the room to the other. One of us popped in Brazil and we waded into deconstructionist battle, armed with poststructuralist hoo-hah. It was obvious to anyone with a pulse that the world we lived in was controlled by One Gigantic Corporation. Everyone knew that, from our faculty to the guy I met who chose to litter because Dumpsters were “too corporate.” Fact: capitalism was a way to enslave human beings, make them utterly boring, deny their natural Dionysian drives toward polyamory and chemical experimentation with consciousness, and oppress them with received gender roles and narrowly defined beauty. If only the straight world would listen to us, we who were enlightened on how to live! I started to see elements of Brazil that I had missed before. As a pre-teen I had simply dug it as weird; now I understood it to be a biting social satire, an indictment against selfishness, narcisism, and the blind pursuit of material wealth, a jeremiad against those who would prevent us from following our bliss.

Just then someone came home with a life-size papier-mâché donkey stolen from a nativity scene. Setting it on fire and throwing it from a balcony was one of the more reasonable ideas floated. I’m compelled to come clean that our apartment was full of stolen goods, but want to make it clear that very few of them had been stolen by me personally. I take no responsibility for the two life-sized fiberglass statues of Ronald McDonald. Or the plaster statue of Michelangelo’s David. The gigantic conference room table was not my idea, either. I did assist with the two 75-pound bags of potting soil. These thefts had nothing to do with procuring goods for use or sale, rather they were our juvenile way of spitting in the eye of our corporate oppressors. Okay, no. We weren’t thinking that deeply. We just thought having a statue of Ronald McDonald would be awesome. Meanwhile, in the world of Brazil, the matrons of commerce obliviously continue their lunch as terrorist bombs explode around them.

***

Brazil was one of the first DVDs I ever purchased, with bonus money from my job as a Customer Service Rep at Amazon.com. I had manned the phones and email during the launch of the music store and now the video/DVD store. In the winter of 1998 I noticed that many customers were calling to ask about DVDs, and I came to understand that the Criterion Collection was considered the standard by which all DVDs were measured. When I heard that Brazil was to be released in a three-disc set, I knew I had to have it.

My first stint at Amazon lasted two years, during which I did everything I could to escape Customer Service and join the Editorial team. When a number of editors were laid off, I realized my editorial career wasn’t going to happen at Earth’s Biggest Bookstore and applied for a position at Drugstore.com, where my wife had begun to work her way up from Customer Service herself. Like Sam Lowry applying for the position that would give him access to secret files about the girl of his dreams, I left a place of relative comfort and camaraderie to join a company on the brink of the implosion of the dotcom bubble, in vague hope that it would advance my editorial career.

Drugstore.com’s offices occupied an office park off Interstate 90 in a suburb of Seattle named Factoria, as in utopia crossed with a factory.

Executioners

My position, Email Communications Editor, had not existed before I went to work on a team of editors who hid in their cubes as if they were bunkers on the battlefront of some hideous, endless military operation. Within a month, everyone who had interviewed me had left the company. Somebody dumped a pile of VB-Script code in my inbox and told me to fix the auto email system. I commuted with my wife, who had a 5 AM phone shift, and ate the cereal provided as a perk while downloading music from Napster and writing product recall emails that were urgent-sounding without being too alarming. The CEO, Kal Raman, a man whose personality had been forged in the economies of India and Wal-Mart, showed up at an editorial meeting to raise an interesting question, “Why do we even need editors when we have Spell-Check?”

Every few months during my short time at Drugstore.com, a number of employees were hooded, tossed into the backs of trucks, and driven to a remote quarry in the Cascades, where they were lined up, forced to kneel, and shot, falling backward into a conveniently-dug mass grave. That’s how it felt at the time, anyway. Soon after one of these layoffs, the managers who’d done the laying off would realize that they’d just let go of someone who was the only person who knew how a particular system worked. So new people would get hired, into newly created positions, provoking a series of turf battles among the existing employees. After a layoff the executive team would pull the remaining employees together in a conference room and try to convince us we shouldn’t flee screaming. One time this involved both Kal Raman’s recitation of passages from the Upanishads and super-investor John Doerr giving us a pep talk about why we shouldn’t worry so much about profitability and the tanking stock price.

By the way, did I mention we also got free soda and Snapple? That was great!

After my boss split, a new boss was hired to replace him, a guy I’ll call Nick. Nick had spent his career writing and editing advertising copy as a contractor for a number of Seattle businesses, and was now ready to join the 9-to-5 working world. He called me into his office a few weeks after he started and said he needed 25 words on a new product called Always Feminine Wipes.

“But you have to be coy about it,” he said, “You can’t use the words ‘pussy’ or ’stink’.”

“How about the word ‘odor’?”

“I don’t think so.”

“Can I use the word ‘moist’?” I said.

“That may be pushing it.”

“What about ‘fresh’?”

“No, that would imply they’d use these things because they are not ‘fresh.’”

“Can I use ‘clean’?”

“Absolutely not. We don’t want to convey that their pussies are unclean.”

“How about ‘revitalizing’?”

“That’s getting closer, but we use that word too much in relation to shampoo around here.”

Later, since all decisions relating to editorial copy five words or longer had to be signed off by ten people, we sat in the Prozac Conference Room and discussed my copy that was absolutely not about a woman’s need to freshen her malodorous cunt. Once we were happy with those 25 words, we discussed our strategy for communicating Drugstore.com’s new “Sexual Well-Being” store. Vibrators, basically.

“How about this,” Nick said, “‘Relax the muscles and get rid of some of that pent-up tension.’”

One guy with a title I didn’t understand raised his hand. “Not to get off-topic here, but how come we don’t sell anything anal?”

Not only did Nick hope to assist customers with finding ways to release their pent-up tension, he was keen on helping our female co-workers do the same. A humanitarian of sorts, he hoped to do this by offering them rides on the back of his motorcycle. One of the women I worked with who must have seemed particularly tense to Nick was a nineteen year-old intern who, whenever passing Nick in the hall, provoked in him a facial expression similar to that of someone who has just bitten down on a lemon wedge.

“So I’m going home to Chicago this weekend to see my mom,” Nick said to me one day during an enforced food-related morale event, “And she has this friend who has a daughter they want to set me up with. All cool, right? So I’m wondering if I should be a gentleman, take this young lady out to a nice dinner, take in a movie, drop her off at home, say goodnight, etc, or if I should just take her straight home and fuck the shit out of her.”

I wrote about toe fungus. I wrote the words “Fresh breath will make her linger longer.” I wrote safety warnings about bath toys. I wrote about Viagra. I wrote “Looking for a nifty gifty?” I wrote about the absorption potential of adult diapers. I thought about writing a novel but couldn’t pull myself together enough to start it. My years as a graduate student honing my fiction were receding behind me as I suffered through a writer’s block that left me feeling forsaken by the muses. I was being punished for taking an email about baby bottle nipples through twenty drafts. I wrote about Q-Tips. 25 words. Or I wrote about the convenience of ordering your Band-Aids online. I entered editorial review meetings in which these upbeat chunks of copy were pulled apart like Thanksgiving turkey by the former sorority sisters responsible for the “customer experience.” Since “words” were part of what customers “experienced,” my words were a source of constant deliberation. That these deliberations involved the best ways to communicate the softness of toilet paper humiliated me. I was feeling more like Sam Lowry every day.

Lowry’s only refuge is his dreams, and when he attempts to pursue his dreams in reality the system in which he lives refuses to tolerate it. Gilliam created a great parable about artistic creation, all the more meaningful considering the struggles he endured to make his vision reach the screen intact. The Criterion edition of the DVD includes two cuts of the film–Gilliam’s cut, and the “Love Conquers All” version in which things end happily ever after for Sam and his ethereal lady friend. Pressured by Universal Studios to leave audiences with an upbeat ending, Gilliam recapitulated Sam’s increasingly disruptive methods by surreptitiously screening his cut of the film to the Los Angeles Film Critics association prior to its theatrical release, resulting in their naming it the best film of the year. When the studio still balked, Gilliam took out a full-page ad in Variety addressed to Universal exec Sid Sheinberg asking why they weren’t releasing his movie as he had created it. Driven to the desperate measure of publicly shaming his opponents, it’s not hard to imagine Gilliam as Lowry, defiantly clutching a mannequin arm as a weapon, squaring off against the gigantic samurai of Hollywood, fighting for his creative vision.

Walking home from Brazil in the early hours of a Saturday, after a week of writing copy about apricot body scrub, I came to understand that a story I had once thought was simply weird, then biting satire, was now one with which I identified completely. The movie had stayed the same over 15 years, but I had changed, and each time I watched Brazil it kept pace with who I was becoming until I found myself a dotcom version of its protagonist, trying to rally the courage to fight for my creative freedom.

One way I attempted to obtain my freedom was by applying for a residency at Yaddo, where I hoped to start my novel. In fall 2000 I submitted my paperwork and writing sample. Weeks later my wife and I were on our way to a Mariners game in which the team had a chance to make it to the playoffs. On the way out I stopped by our mailbox and found the acceptance letter from Yaddo. That night the Mariners made it to the playoffs and I started putting together a list of things I’d need to bring with me to Saratoga Springs. At work the following Monday I didn’t make much effort to mask my ebullience and word quickly spread among the editors that I had gotten invited to this somewhat prestigious artist colony. A few weeks later I lost my job.

This particular layoff was bungled from the start. After previous layoffs Drugstore.com had hired a woman who specialized in post-layoff counseling for remaining employees. She had led sessions where employees wrote angry things on big pieces of butcher paper taped to conference room walls. When I saw this “layoff lady” struggling with the espresso machine in the kitchen one morning I knew we were doomed. Word was we would all get invited to one of two meetings, one at ten o’clock, the other at eleven. As soon as the meeting request popped into my Outlook, my wife called me from her office across the campus.

“Which meeting did you get?” she said.

“The ten o’clock.” I said, “What about you?”

“The eleven.”

I shuffled into the meeting room and allowed them to place the hood over my head.

Nick, naturally, kept his job.

February 23rd, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Burn After Reading and The Iron Giant

Oscars, whatever.

I had two comfy movie-watching experiences this weekend. On Friday I watched the Coen Brothers’ Burn After Reading with my wife and yesterday sat down with my son to watch the Brad Bird animated movie The Iron Giant.

Conventional wisdom had it that Burn After Reading was a minor Coen Bros. film, on par with Intolerable Cruelty, and those who admired No Country for Old Men would find it lacking. But I had fun the whole time, appreciating the clockwork storytelling and delivery of droll humor. The movie reminded me how much I like George Clooney and gave me a reason to like Brad Pitt. The Coens make movies the same way the band Cake makes songs, with clearly delineated forces of action pushing one moment into the next, each player doing his or her distinct part to maintain the integrity of the whole. The Coen Brothers. I like those guys.

While watching the Oscars last night I had one of those weird experiences where someone mentions a pretty forgotten movie you just watched. In this case it was America’s most overrated actress Jennifer Anniston remarking on The Iron Giant, a 10-year-old movie directed by the guy who would go on to join Pixar and create The Incredibles. The Iron Giant has long been on my list, as it’s based on a novel by Ted Hughes, and is my friend Doug’s favorite children’s movie. I was curious about how Sylvia Plath’s (husband? boyfriend?) pulled off a robot novel. Good ole Wikipedia. While the novel takes place in the UK, the movie is set in the autumnal richness of Maine. My son and I dug it. Here’s a trailer.

And hey, since I’m on the subject of giant beings from outer space invading the English countryside, check out, if you haven’t, the radio dramatization of War of the Worlds by Jeff Wayne. Imagine, if possible, a prog-rock version of the Orson Welles radio classic as executed by Richard Burton and Phil Lynott of Thin Lizzy. Oh yeah.

***

THE EYEBALL homepage

February 17th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Gran Torino

The Uptown Theater, Port Townsend, WA

The Uptown Theater, Port Townsend, WA

Port Townsend, Washington has two superb theaters, one called The Rose, the other The Uptown. By superb I mean they’re in old buildings, they don’t show commercials, the popcorn is served with more or less real butter, and the marquees bear the names of international films and Oscar-worthy mainstream pics. Last week I caught Gran Torino at The Uptown with my friends Matthew and Michael, both poets, both of whom hated the film. Michael recently blogged eloquently and with distaste about it.

I could spend a couple hours watching Clint Eastwood scowl, which he does aplenty, even delivering a line that rightfully belongs to John McCain: “Get off my lawn!” (Honestly, he really does say this.) Clint plays a widower named Walt who befriends the family of Hmong immigrants next door. Confrontations in a racially monochromatic Detroit ensue, Clint does a Dirty Harry imitation, and epithets are delivered with the post-PC air of semi-ironic bigotry. Frankly, I found no offense in the wop-gook-pollack tirades of this octogenarian lawn care enthusiast. Whatever. What did offend me was how the supporting cast of non-actors did a lot of non-acting.

Get off my lawn!

"Get off my lawn!"

Bad acting tends to turn a film into a meta viewing experience. The mind wanders toward speculation about what the director was trying to achieve, what he must have thought while enduring a scene of forced pathos. With Gran Torino, Eastwood was riffing once again on his theme of how to manage man’s capacity for violence, how to mitigate it or confine it within a moral framework that limits its chaotic spread. His character Walt, who comes across like every other Eastwood character coiled into a bitter and prickly ball, is resigned to martyr himself, and Eastwood the director seems equally resigned here. Screw it, he seems to be saying, this movie doesn’t have to be perfect, it just has to say that VIOLENCE IS BAD STUFF that shouldn’t happen to GOOD PEOPLE.

Gran Torino reminded me in a lot of ways to the Michael Douglas vehicle Falling Down, which was also about a surly white guy muddling through multi-cultural America. Both are films that strain to tell us that bigots are, deep down, just decent guys who want stable jobs and can be won over with a hot meal. Gran Torino is a movie made for all those Republicans trying to make sense of Obama’s America, phobic of the otherness of immigrants, willing to give those same immigrants the benefit of the doubt as long as they pay heed to good old American values like hard work and tasteful landscaping.

After the show, I popped in a DVD of bonus features included in a Sergio Leone boxed set and watched Eastwood commenting on the stylistic panache of the legendary Italian filmmaker. The interview footage was shot maybe ten years ago, and in it Eastwood comes across as happy, cheerful, at the top of his game. If Gran Torino is his last film, or is the last film in which he stars, the obit writers will cite it as his swan song, a “fitting end to a legendary career.” But to really celebrate the man with the squint, I’ll take The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly any day.

Please God let me watch Mystic River instead!

"Please God let me watch Mystic River instead!"

As if to challenge this vision of man’s solemn mastery over the ways of violence, the day after Gran Torino I watched a documentary on Kubrick’s A Clockwork Orange. Devoid of anything resembling human warmth, Kubrick’s masterpiece says something more terrifying about our compulsion to wage mayhem and even worse, to enjoy it as entertainment. Where Eastwood returns again and again to the saving grace of human decency, Kubrick asks if redemption is even possible once we’ve unleashed the monstrosities hiding in our limbic systems. One can only image how Dirty Harry would have taken to Alex and his merry band of droogs.

February 9th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: The Thief of Baghdad

The Eyeball is currently teaching creative writing in a decommissioned military base on the Olympic Peninsula, which means late-night DVD watching in the officers quarters. Last night I watched The Thief of Baghdad, a 1940 film directed by a hodgepodge of Brits: Ludwig Berger, Michael Powell, and Tim Whelan. From what I’ve gleaned from the booklet that came with this Criterion Collection release, it’s more of a producer’s film, created under the auspices of Alexander Korda. Fans of Technicolor and actors with wispy mustaches, you’re going to want to check this out.

Maybe it was the word “Baghdad” that got me, but I couldn’t watch this film outside the frame of all the bad shit that’s gone down in that part of the world, etc. etc. I wanted to enjoy this film more than I actually did. Watching Anglo actors play the parts of sultans and princesses amid splendidly designed sets kinda nauseated me, to tell you the truth. It wasn’t quite a musical, but there were occasional weird bursts of song. If you’ve read this blog before, you know I’m charitable toward lousy special effects, but there were scenes of a flying genie that looked like something I shot in my bedroom with a Mr. T action figure in 1983.

What would be really interesting would be to see the reverse, a Middle Eastern film from the same era about, say, the early days of America or the UK. Do such films exist? Has Bollywood ever made a biopic about Queen Elizabeth or the travels of Lewis and Clark? Or does the process of cultural reapropriation move in only one direction, with the West plundering the East? If you know of any examples of films from Asia or the Middle East that try to depict life in the West, do let me know.

February 2nd, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Guy Maddin

I held out for just the right time to watch Guy Maddin’s Brand Upon the Brain! and caved this weekend, experiencing it like I do so many movies now, on my laptop with a couple earbud headphones. Friends, this is the absolute wrong way to experience this film. It was created as a live spectacle, to be accompanied by a narrator, 11-piece orchestra, and three foley artists. I’m embarrassed to report that I missed Brand when it played in Seattle in 2006; I can only assume I was tending to a vomiting child at the time.

Get a load of the trailer:

I was pleased to see that a passing acquaintance named Annette Toutonghi appears in the cast as one of the two murderous sisters. In another life, I sat next to Annette as we answered phones for an online retailer, calmly explaining to customers that their shipments would eventually arrive. What I remember most about Annette was her remarkable voice, a sweet trill made for narrating fairy tales. Alas! Brand Upon the Brain! is an ostensibly silent film, and Maddin had no use for Annette’s pipes.

By ostensibly, I mean that there’s music, sound effects provided by the aforementioned foley artists, and narration in the form of an “explicator.” The DVD allows you to choose your own explicator, among them Isabella Rossellini, Crispin Glover, and John Ashbery. Jesus, people, what cinematic heaven is this?

Watching the making-of feature, I began to appreciate Maddin’s mastery of cinema’s vocabulary even more. The man draws from 100+ years of film history in the form and content of his films. Flashes of color in this otherwise black and white film come inspired by similar techniques in Nosferatu. The role of explicator emerged as a result of something Buñuel said about the narrated films of his childhood. Maddin shot the film with hand-held 8mm cameras, then edited it in Final Cut Pro. While editing his previous film, Cowards Bend the Knee, he became fascinated by how the software fast-forwarded and rewinded—not more or less fluidly sped-up, as with VHS, but choppily, bypassing segments, touching down occasionally on an image. With Brand, Maddin incorporated this movement in the final product. The result is something that looks like a dream.

A live perfomance of Brand Upon the Brain!

A live perfomance of Brand Upon the Brain!

Pause to consider what Maddin has achieved here. It’s easy to think of him as a purveyor of images inspired by the films of the 1930s. But he is also resolutely a citizen of his own era, getting the most out of the more-or-less cheap and current technology his budgets dictate. In Maddin’s films we see a collision of both the extremely antiquated (art direction, score, melodramatic acting) and the tools and sensibilities of the YouTube generation. I would LOVE to see what he could do with a typical multi-million dollar small film budget.

This weekend I also re-watched one of Maddin’s earlier films, 1992’s Careful, recently re-released by Zeitgeist Video. Imagine a Leni Reifenstahl mountain movie as viewed through a Mark Rothko painting. The same sexual agony that makes Brand so compelling is here in spades, as Maddin and his screenwriting partner George Toles dish out a primordial tale of incest set in a town that embodies repression of the most extreme variety. The film so resolutely belongs in its own genre. Here’s a clip.

So on one hand, you’ve got Maddin’s methodology, his blend of old cinematic forms and new, of necessary cheapness and global distribution, of cinema as experienced through an 8mm lens and cinema as live spectacle. With these tools, Maddin has chosen to shape experiences most personal and shameful, each film getting closer to autobiographical purity while he embraces the freeing release of melodrama. It’s in these contradictions and forces that seemingly should be at odds, but which Maddin lovingly stitches together like a mad tailor, that his great art finds the screen.

Now I need to find the right time and place to experience My Winnipeg.

January 27th, 2009

THE EYEBALL: Fake Out

Rumpus blogger Rick Moody posted a comment to my recent post about Lord of the Rings asking whether the special effects of that film still held up. I got to thinking about why we accept some special effects as cool even when we can tell they’re fake while we turn up our noses at other special effects. On one end of the spectrum are the effects Wes Anderson used in The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou, including fakey animated shots of sea life and a cross-section of the ship The Belafonte right out of a theater production design master class. On the other end of the spectrum we have the straight-to-DVD science fiction movies of bargain bins and pretty much anything related to science fiction that BBC has ever been involved in. Dr. Who, I’m talking about you.

George Meliess Voyage to the Moon
George Melies’s Voyage to the Moon

Why do we laugh at some special effects because they are so blatantly fraudulent, yet delight at the same level of effects when employed in a different context? Why is it that Tarantino can have a model airplane fly over a model of Tokyo and this is accepted as evidence of his mastery over the medium, while a similar model plane flying over Tokyo in a C-grade Japanese monster movie elicits snorts?

I think it boils down to three interconnected questions. One, how comfortable is the film’s creator with the fundamental falseness of the medium? Two, how much is the creator trying to “fool” the audience into thinking what they’re seeing is real? Three, how strong is the story?

The effects-driven films we tend to think of as shitty are those, I think, that either try too hard to trick us into thinking what we’re watching is real at the expense of storytelling. Filmmakers who pay inordinate attention to whether the fur on their CGI gorilla looks like “real” fur while putting this gorilla in a lame story bring attention to the falseness of the effects, and our distaste for the CGI is really a transferred distaste for the story.

Ray Harryhausen with some of his creations
Ray Harryhausen with some of his creations

We’re more forgiving of films with crappy effects that serve a well-told story. We’re willing to give the creator a little slack, particularly when it comes to older films. I recently re-watched Ray Harryhausen’s Jason and the Argonauts with my son and re-loved every minute of it. You can’t help but notice the seams and rivets of this 1963 film, with its stop-motion skeleton army and abundance of reaction shots. Even though the filmmaking tricks are so easy to discern, the movie holds up by virtue of the sincerity with which it was made. Harryhausen, like George Melies before him and Peter Jackson today, was working with the state-of-the-art movie magic of his day and took seriously the task of entertaining an audience.

The bathtub from iThe Science of Sleep/i
The bathtub from The Science of Sleep

Now that we have a century’s worth of filmmaking trickery behind us, today’s auteurs, working without the budgets of the Finchers and Jacksons of the world, can embrace an equally legit cinematic orientation by flatly accepting fakeness. I’m thinking of Michel Gondry’s Science of Sleep in which crinkled cellophane plays the part of water in a bathtub. Or the antique shop decay of the Bros. Quay or my fave Guy Maddin’s super-saturated Careful, coming soon in a remastered and “repressed” (I assume in many senses of the word) version from Zeitgeist Video. I plan to devote a future post to nothing but Maddin.

So the question of whether the effects of a particular film still hold up isn’t the same question as whether those effects are comfortable in their falseness, whether the strength of the story allows us to reserve our judgment of obviously fake effects, and whether the filmmaker is trying to replace reality or create a reality of his own.

January 21st, 2009

The Eyeball: Lord of the Rings

Last Friday I was laid up with some kind of nasty stomach bug that left me prone most of the day. What better time than to revisit Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring? It was literally the first thing my hand fell upon when I nauseously pawed at my DVD cabinet looking for something undemanding to watch.

The surge?

Is the surge working?

It was hard not to watch LOTR again without experiencing another, political, kind of nausea, as the trilogy will always be linked in my mind to the run-up and launch of the Iraq war. I’m certain Peter Jackson set out to make a kickass, 12-hour film spectacle and couldn’t have predicted the winds that would be blowing through American culture on its release. The trilogy was released on three consecutive Decembers from 2001 to 2003. The first episode arrived in theaters a little over a month after 9/11. The second (coincidentally named The Two Towers) appeared while the drum beats of war echoed loud, shortly after Bush requested “all means that he determines to be appropriate” to launch the war. By the climax of The Return of the King, the war was in full swing.

The LOTR trilogy was a smash hit, appealing to critics and audiences across a broad demographic swath. It was easy to watch it as allegory and simply switch out the names of the good guys and bad guys to fit your political leanings. To me, the Bush administration was Sauron’s forces, but conservatives just as easily could have looked at the orc hordes as fantastical embodiments of the terrorist boogeymen Bush relentlessly invoked.
Watching The Fellowship of the Ring in the last days of the Bush administration, my body aching and head pounding, I wondered if what will date it most is the fundamental good-vs.-evil dynamic that provides the movies with their drama. Yesterday, recovered from my illness and watching the inaugural address, I gasped when President Obama addressed the Muslim world like a mature adult who appreciates the world’s ambiguities rather than casting every conflict in “with us or against” Manichean certainties. I wonder what cinematic spectacles will come to be thematically entwined in this bright new age?

January 6th, 2009

The Eyeball: Fellini’s Amarcord

I Remember

Last night I met up with some of my former Amazon colleagues, guys who, like me, served tours of duty on the DVD team, to watch Fellini’s Amarcord at Siff Cinema. The faces, rumps, busts, and girths of the cast jiggled, jumped, and danced. Fantasies and art direction cast their vaudevillian spell. The movie is all about the auteur’s nostalgia for the events of his childhood in 1930s, Fascist Italy, but I read film more as an evocation of a feeling of a place. Which is why my thoughts this morning were drawn to memories of floods, migrant workers, dusty fields, forests, gnarled apple trees, and livestock. By offering the feast of his own childhood, Fellini made me hungry to remember my own.


…more

January 3rd, 2009

THE EYEBALL: What I Watched This Weekend, Yojimbo

I’m fascinated by cultural cross-pollination when it comes to art. The Beatles dug Buddy Holly, the psychedelic bands of San Francisco dug the Beatles, the Britpop bands of the nineties dug those psychedelic bands, and the Dandy Warhols watered down those Britpop bands. When it comes to movies, I don’t think there’s much more fascinating case study of cross-pollination than how Akira Kurosawa influenced westerns (particularly the spaghetti westerns of Sergio Leone) and they influenced him right back. Case in point, Yojimbo, starring the always magnetic Toshiro Mifune.

I feasted my eyes on this western-inspired samurai tale this weekend. One might call it an udon western. It has the trappings of the genre, including wind-swept streets, frightened villagers, and guys who walk toward each other really, really slowly. Even the music sounds like something Ennio Morricone might come up with if he had access to an orchestra of koto and shamisen players. Mifune plays Sanjuro, a samurai who stumbles into said wind-swept town to find it torn asunder by two warring factions. A moral relativist, Sanjuro takes then switches sides, playing the feud to his benefit. Here’s a trailer.

…more

December 22nd, 2008

The Eyeball: A Blog About Film by Ryan Boudinot

Up the Riggings, You Monkeys!

For Christmas, 1972, when I was almost two months old, my parents’ friend Mr. White gave them a book called A New Pictorial History of the Talkies. My mom taught grade school with Mr. White in the Virgin Islands, and this formal manner of addressing him in the halls carried over into their social interactions as well. To this day, we address Jim White as Mr. White, as in, “Are you planning to come to Seattle this year to see The Ring, Mr. White?” and “Mr. White, could you hand me the salt please?” Aside from decades of friendship, Mr. White’s most lasting gift to me is this book, a collection of stills of movies from 1929 to 1968, from Bulldog Drummond to Funny Girl. I spent my childhood engrossed in its pages, paying particular attention to the stills of Frankenstein and Dracula, not to mention the topless shot of Hedy Lamarr in a Czech film called Extase.

Captain Blood
Of course, when I was perusing these black and white stills in the late seventies, before VHS, I had no hope of ever seeing the movies themselves. Talkies was a repository of lost cinematic memories, of movies one might be able to catch, with luck, on late-night television. I’d stare at these images of cowboys and swashbucklers with longing, the same kind of longing I’d feel later when flipping through old newspapers in the morgue of The Skagit Argus where I worked. It’s not simply that vanished artistic expressions are poignant in themselves. It’s that the jovial, sentimental, elegant spirits these old movies conveyed make their loss so much more painful. The actors and directors who created these works were at the time concentrating on entertaining the audiences of their day, rarely–if ever–thinking beyond the next weekend’s box office numbers. But these films still have much to say to us now, here, eighty plus years later.
…more

December 15th, 2008

The Eyeball: What I Watched this Weekend – Dracula, Pages from a Virgin’s Diary


\Suck it.

Suck it.

Hey tweens who enjoy a little abstinence-only subtext thrown in with your vampire movies: go out and get a load of the non-virginal variety in Guy Maddin’s Dracula: Pages from a Virgin’s Diary. This was one of the Maddin movies I’ve been saving. It’s the Canadian director’s collaboration with the Royal Winnipeg Ballet. Which means that in addition to bared fangs there is DANCING. I have to say this wasn’t one of my favorite Maddin films. While the art direction made its nods to German Expressionism, Maddin’s presence only really became obvious in the editing–the droll title cards, a sequence of blood spreading across a map of Europe, …more

December 12th, 2008

The Eyeball, a Blog Ostensibly About Film by Ryan Boudinot

popcorn
Your Weekend Popcorn Recipe

My brother-in-law Chad Johnson’s popcorn recipe is the best. I’ve enjoyed it at his and my sister-in-law’s place over the years while watching Pulp Fiction and during their rigorously opinionated James Bond sessions. I don’t know if he got the recipe from somewhere else, but in our house my son calls it “Uncle Chaddie Popcorn.”

When I met Chad years ago, he was wearing a T-shirt with a picture of a dreadlocked George H.W. Bush under the words “The Dreaded Republican.” His popcorn is equally leftist. If you’re the kind of person who reads Naomi Klein and don’t shave your nether regions, this is the popcorn for you.

…more

December 10th, 2008

The Eyeball, a New Blog by Ryan Boudinot

The Cleavers, on fireActs of Nostalgia

My old friend Nate sent me this picture yesterday, taken some 17 years ago. That’s me in the middle, playing drums, wearing a pith helmet onto which is adhered a lit candle. The guy playing bass to the left is today one of the chief economists at the Federal Reserve, formerly an advisor on global economics to Alan Greenspan. The guy singing is now a tour manager for bands like the White Stripes, MIA, and Cold War Kids.Old Joy

I’ve been sort of marinating in nostalgia these past couple days, poring over this and even more incriminating photos of my college years, which got me thinking about a beguiling 2006 film called Old Joy by Kelly Reichardt. …more

December 9th, 2008

The Eyeball, a New Blog by Ryan Boudinot

Double Features

Citizen Kane

I created an account on The Auteurs a couple weeks ago. It’s an addictive site for film nerds started by a company working in close collaboration with The Criterion Collection. Right now it’s in beta. It’s a message board/blog/hulu/social networking kind of thing.

Anyway, one of the postings there recently asked users to list their ideal double features. Here are a few of the more inspired responses.
…more

About Ryan Boudinot

Ryan Boudinot is the author of the short story collection The Littlest Hitler (2006) and the novel Misconception. He was a DVD Editor at Amazon.com from 2003 to 2007. His work has appeared in McSweeney's, The Best American Nonrequired Reading, and other journals and anthologies. He lives in Seattle and teaches creative writing at Goddard College's Port Townsend MFA program.

Subscribe

Subscribe to this author's blog via RSS

Other Columns

Rumpus EventsA Night Together in New York City   ...moreMarch 15th, 2010

Ted WilsonTed Wilson Reviews the World #27   ...moreMarch 15th, 2010

Funny WomenFUNNY WOMEN (COMBO!) #18: Publishing House   ...moreMarch 12th, 2010




Get a cool ass Rumpus t-shirt.

Subscribe to The Daily Rumpus

Email:

Donate to the rumpus