“Creating the blog might have been his grasp at taking control of our story, but it was also his attempt to speak to me in my language, or on my platform anyway.”

Related Posts:

• Monomania: Why Writing All By Your Lonesome Kind of Sucks
• Where I’ve Laid My Head
• Writing for the Ear
• “Mistakes Were Made”
• Make-or-Break

He started going out to bars at midnight once I began insisting on my sleep. Midnight became my cutoff. I could see my life devolving. He wanted me volatile. Called me an operative, an automaton, a shell or a construct: not much of anything at all.

He told me his bar stories, trying to catalyze a reaction.

Everyone I knew seemed to be reading Ekhart Tolle’s The Power of Now. Tolle’s rehash of mystical presence and mindfulness spoke to everyone but me. I’d had it with the present, so I wrote out jokes to myself about a parody– The Power of Then. I was so tired.

He called my evenness passive-aggression. And the truth was that I was ready to learn some reactivity. In my submissive blur any discernment seemed threatening.

On the subway platform, I paced. The habit of listening to music didn’t come naturally. He was a musician and preferred the music in his head to the music through the stereo, and our tastes were different anyway. At this point we’d been married 13 years. I had an iPod that I had gotten for free with a computer but I didn’t listen to it because it offended him. His loneliness was my job and it was full-time.

It was therapy that taught me to listen to music. I started with the things I had listened to in high school– a curious mixture of Pink Floyd, Sondheim show tunes, Bach and Brahms. During the marriage a few CDs had made it in–Brian Eno’s ambient series and contemporary chamber groups like the string quartet Ethel and the choir Ars Nova Copenhagen. I listened to those too and I downloaded a Fleet Foxes song that I’d heard at a yoga class. The lyric “how could the body die” gave me comfort. Somewhere along the line I’d heard Joanna Newsom and I swallowed her whole–the timber of her voice reminded me of the Beijing Opera I’d fallen in love with after the 1994 movie Farewell My Concubine. I had been so moved by the insistent squeal of the Chinese two-stringed erhu that I bought one for him when he wasn’t yet my husband. It was my gift to him on the occasion of our first Christmas.

It was through Joanna Newsom that music became a feature of the house. The first few plucks that open The Milk-Eyed Mender anchored me. I could feel my shoulders loosen. By this point I was too perpetually distressed to read books.

He said I didn’t understand what a man was. He slept in late every morning but I wanted to get up early. The bed was something to escape from. Trying to climb over him without waking him didn’t work if I waited too long.

When he woke and I said, “Hello,” he said he’d hit the end of his fuse. He began: “This morning was a reminder of all the thousands of mornings where we did it this way.” He said his love was unrequited. He said he’d been dragging and pulling and dragging me along in the marriage.

He wanted me to understand the biology of a man. He said I was going to have to try and find a way to reverse the fear I’d instilled in him. He said, “Be careful not to pressure, be careful, be careful, I don’t know how to be any more careful.” He said there shouldn’t be any rage on my end. He said that what I should have is compassion. He said he was dying. That our love was dying. His passion for me was dying.

During the year of all that saying, one of the compromises he made was to try and find some good in the music I liked. When I became frozen, an immovable and empty body curled in the upper left hand corner of the bed, he took to putting my Joanna Newsom CD on for me. He said he’d come to realize that her compositions were skilled.

But now that I listened to my iPod on the train I wanted to listen to even more music at home. One CD wasn’t enough for me. And his objections to me listening my iPod in his presence never gave way.

A woman I considered a friend but didn’t know well included me in the email dispersion of a file sharing “mixed tape” and that went right onto my iPod too. One song above all the others drew me, seeming to tell just the story I needed to hear.

That’s how Frida Hyvönen came into my life. And I knew from the start that she represented danger of the best, most delicious, life changing variety. For the first month I managed to keep “Pony” a secret.

But he’d figured out how to hook my iPod up to the stereo so I could listen without excluding him from the songs I was experiencing. I stayed on my toes when I heard it coming and quickly skipped it but eventually he heard:

The stable is where you learn to be in charge
and not take shit

dressed to the occasion
leather boots and swift black whip

He was hearing my fantasy of power and he was revolted. He said something about fucked up feminists but the song went on:

I don’t even have to use it
I just hold it like this

pony knows when she sees it
that does she not behave

she’ll get to taste it

He always seemed to be talking. He said that what I called pressure was my unknowing who he was. He said I was hostile to knowing how he felt. That I was asking him to negate himself and that if he did voice how he felt I called that pressure. He said I wouldn’t register his frustration as a natural reaction. He said I was hiding something from him and he wanted me to reach out toward him but I barely left his sight. I had no private world, up against walls, I had no space to reach through. He said I wasn’t honest.

On my way to therapy, walking the long Time Square corridor between the E and the 1, “Leather boots and swift black whip.” It was still unusual for me to be out walking on my own. It was only to go to therapy that I left his side, so with all the thrill of a teenager in the city, on an adventure, “I don’t even have to use it… pony knows when she sees it…she’ll get to taste it.” And putting my feet down on the title floor, standing up straight. Through osmosis I absorbed some strong.

I often didn’t bother with the second half of the song,

tickle the palm of my hand
with great eager lips

I give you sugar, pony
if you give me obedience

which started to loose me. Really I was just dying to be left alone, let free. Anything other than feeling some control was beside the point.

My mother was always bothered by the flicking of stations on the radio but at some point it dawned on me I can skip songs I don’t like, and I can listen again and again to particular sections of songs I love.

I loved the image of the whip.

The second time the song came on over the home stereo was during a rare moment of closeness and I confessed that I found the music empowering. I teased that he was the pony and he began prancing around the apartment and singing, to the tune of Hi-Ho-the-Dairy-Oh, “The pony gets the whip, the pony gets the whip,” his right arm reaching over his left shoulder pretending to whip himself and when he whipped he pranced even higher.

For months it went on like that. I was living in the version of love where I’m consumed by the needs of others, and I was feeling hurt and mocked, and we were both drowning in our separate anguish as he pranced, “The pony gets the whip, the pony gets the whip.”

He told me that his therapist said I just don’t like him. He told me that his therapist said I play games.

I couldn’t say, “stop.” Or, “I have nothing more to give.”

He said that his therapist told him he was enabling me by sitting and waiting and letting me hold my anger against him. At midnight he left to go drinking and at 4 a.m. came home, desperate for affection. I was holding his hand when he said, “What if you were my prostitute and I could just pay you.”

Then I found myself walking once again through the long corridor at Times Square, listening to “Pony,” my journal tucked under my right arm. That time I took it into both hands to do the klutzy dance of writing while walking and wrote, “Is divorce the light at the end of the tunnel of marriage?”

***

Now he’s been gone for 9 months and I hardly notice “Pony” when it comes up in rotation. Instead, I’m listening to Frida’s album as a whole. I’m hearing, “The love of my life/ when I was a kid.” And I’m hearing, “you do the dirty/ and I do the dancing.” I’m hearing her playfulness with language and willingness to tell real stories.

I hear, “the relief in the grief.”

And:

You count on the birds
you count on the birds

you count on them
to represent your longing

And I am grateful for my own longing. And grateful to be in the city. And grateful for the music I take along with me on my way.

Related Posts:

• Is Marriage Obsolete?
• ALBUMS OF OUR LIVES: BOB DYLAN’S BLONDE ON BLONDE
• Multiplicity
• ALBUMS OF OUR LIVES: TO THE EXTREME BY VANILLA ICE
• Albums of Our Lives: Songs: Ohia’s Magnolia Electric Co.

Dear Sugar, Sugah, Sage,

I’m a spry 47 year-old feisty broad. For the past three years I’ve been deeply in love with a woman. The timing of our meeting was atrocious. Her father was dying, she was recently downsized, and we were both nurturing recent heartbreaks. But once she quoted John Donne over my naughty bits after making love, I was done for. She pushed me away over and over again, and then started inviting me more frequently into her heart.

We’ve struggled ever since. Her sex drive has vanished (we’ve done it all—doctors, therapists, reading). She cannot fully commit, and she is consumed by fear (she’s a love avoider classic).

With her I find the highest of highs and the lowest of lows. We’ve broken up and reunited more times than I can count and we are currently on an absolute restriction from each other for thirty days, which we’ve never managed. We are deeply KNOWN by each other in a spiritual, sacred way I’ve never been known before. Addictive, yes. Hence the break.

I should say she loves me deeply and, in some ways, when I demanded the full break, she took it harder than me.

I believe, as a Midwestern lesbian, that I will never find this again and thus, I stay and tolerate her “rules,” her angst, her sexual anorexia despite being a lusty broad. Yes, I’ve tried taking lovers. It simply does not work for me. Though our lovemaking is rare (4-5 times per year), when we’ve made love it has been transcendent.

I’m a quirky unusual complex woman and it is hard to find a match. What the hell? What do YOU think?

Much love either way.

Signed,
Should I Stay or Should I Go Now?

Dear Should I Stay or Should I Go Now,

What the hell, indeed. It sounds pretty crazy to me. Breaking up and getting back together more times than you can count? Sexual anorexia and “rules”? Your use of the word addiction? All those things unsettle me. But you know what unsettles me the most? This business about your lover being the only one who has “KNOWN” you in a “spiritual, sacred way,” coupled with your conviction that you will “never find this again and thus” you stay.

Find what, pray tell? A sexually and emotionally withholding lover who is terrified of commitment and intimacy? If you and I were sitting at your kitchen table composing your ad for lustybroadslookingforlove.com is this what you’d ask for?

You would not. I encourage you to contemplate why you’re accepting that now, sweet pea. This relationship isn’t meeting your needs; it’s pushing your buttons. Namely, the big button that says, I’m a 47 year-old Midwestern lesbian, so I’d better take what I can get. You write about your lover’s fear, but it’s your own fear that’s messing with your head. I know it’s hard to be alone, darling. Your anxieties about finding another partner are understandable, but they can’t be the reason to stay. Desperation is unsustainable. It might have gotten you through until now, but you’re too old and awesome to fake it anymore.

This doesn’t necessarily mean you and your lover are doomed. Good couples sometimes get off to an appalling start. Perhaps the two of you will make it through, but you won’t if you continue as you are. I know your connection feels powerful and rare and incendiary. I know it seems like this woman is your own personal intimacy messiah. But you’re wrong. True intimacy isn’t a cluster fuck or a psychodrama. It isn’t the “highest highs and lowest lows.” It isn’t John Donne whispered into your crotch followed by months of not-exactly-agreed-upon celibacy. It’s a tiny bit of those things on occasion with a whole lot of everything else in between. It’s communion and mellow compatibility. It’s friendship and mutual respect. It’s not having to say we must have an “absolute restriction on each other” for thirty days.

That isn’t love, Lusty Broad. It’s a restraining order. You don’t have intimacy with this woman. You have intensity and scarcity. You have emotional turmoil and an overwrought sense of what the two of you together means.

I believe you know that. I could put most of the letters I receive into two piles: those from people who are afraid to do what they know in their hearts they need to do and those from people who have genuinely lost their way. I’d put your letter in the former pile. I think you wrote to me because you realize you need to make a change, but you’re scared of what that change will mean. I sympathize. Neither of us can know how long it will be before you find love again. But we do know that so long as you stay in a relationship that isn’t meeting your needs, you’re in a relationship that isn’t meeting your needs. It makes you miserable and it also closes you off to other, potentially more satisfying romantic relationships.

Click here to purchase a Sugar Shirt!

I am not a religious person. I don’t meditate or chant or pray. But lines from poems I love run through my head and they feel holy to me in a way. There’s a poem by Adrienne Rich I first read twenty years ago called “Splittings” that I thought of when I read your letter. The last two lines of the poem are: “I choose to love this time for once / with all my intelligence.” It seemed such a radical thought when I first read those lines when I was twenty-two—that love could rise from our deepest, most reasoned intentions rather than our strongest shadowy doubts. The number of times I choose to love this time for once with all my intelligence has run through my head in the past twenty years cannot be counted. There hasn’t been a day when those lines weren’t present for me in ways both conscious and unconscious. You could say I’m devoted to them, even in times when I’ve failed profoundly to live up to their aspirations.

I suggest that you devote yourself to them too, sweet pea. The question isn’t whether you should stay or go. The question is how would your life be transformed if you chose to love this time for once with all your intelligence?

I’m not talking to your crotch, sister. I’m looking you in the eye.

Yours,
Sugar

***

Sugar will be taking next week off, but will return on November 4th.

***

You can follow Sugar on Twitter here.

Or join her Facebook fan page here.

And don’t forget the Dear Sugar Google Group.

***

Got a problem? Hit the Sugar spot: sugar@therumpus.net.

[Editor's note: If you prefer to keep your question 100% anonymous it is best to use the form below.]

Your Name*
Your Email Address
Subject*
Your Question*
Image Verification Please enter the text from the image: [Refresh Image][What's This?]

Powered byEMF PHP Form

Related Posts:

• Nick Cave Monday #14: “Wild World”
• DEAR SUGAR, The Rumpus Advice Column #57: That Ecstatic Parade
• DEAR SUGAR, The Rumpus Advice Column #49: The Locked Cock
• DEAR SUGAR, The Rumpus Advice Column #43: Unrolling
• Writing While (Not) Loving, Loving While (Not) Writing

Author Shirley Jackson’s husband Stanley Hyman, a literary critic and writer for The New Yorker, devised strict writing schedules for her. And with the money from Jackson’s royalty checks, he purchased a dishwasher to make more time for her writing.”

At The Millions, a provocative essay on the joys and difficulties of balancing relationships and writing.

Related Posts:

• Tandem Reading
• Interstitial Days
• “No, I’m the Narrator”
• Choosing Words Carefully
• Action! Violence! Jilted Lovers! Pulp History!