When I emailed Shalom Auslander, inviting him to help me summon the courage necessary to write first-person non-fiction my parents might not like, he wrote back: “Any time I can help drive a wedge between family members, I’m happy to try.”
I had been dying to talk to Auslander for three years since I devoured, Foreskin’s Lament, his 2007 memoir about breaking away first from Hassidism and then from his crazy family following the birth of his first son. With his unique brand of bleak, acid humor, Auslander writes of being “raised like a veal” in the orthodox Jewish community of Monsey, New York, where he was indoctrinated with the crippling fear of an angry, malevolent god. He endures life with an alcoholic, violent father and a manipulative, intrusive mother, not to mention a classmate who is intent on punking Auslander by squeezing his balls. With life clearly sucking, and no apparent payoff for his piety, it’s no wonder he’s tempted to test god, first with non-kosher food, and later with shoplifting and porn.
As someone who was raised with reform Judaism, my negative experiences with religion pale next to Auslander’s. Seriously – the one thing I was ever forbidden to do was “date” a Puerto Rican boy when I was 11. Still, I closely identified with the need to break free of a heavily-imposed non-sensical and neurotic set of guiding principals. And I so admired his fearlessness in depicting everyone, including himself, in all their mishuggenah glory.
I met with Auslander, who is finishing his first novel, at a café near his home in Woodstock, New York.
***
The Rumpus: You started with Beware of God, a book of short fiction. You’re writing a novel now. What made you decide to write a memoir, Foreskin’s Lament, in between?
Shalom Auslander: Well I had done seven or eight pieces for “This American Life,” and I was wondering how they might fit together. Originally I just thought they would be individual pieces. But at the time I was doing it I was also going through this final break up with my family, and having a son at the same time, so I decided, Well let me just write this for him. So it became an explanation. It never really will be, but it was my first sort of shot at explaining why I am the way I am and where I came from and all that kind of stuff. Also, I kind of felt that I was not ever going to get over that subject matter until I did this.
Rumpus: I know that feeling so well.
Auslander: You know, there was this feeling that it had to be done, like, head-on or I was going to deal with it obliquely for the rest of my life and I did not necessarily want to do that.
Rumpus: I read an essay you wrote for Tablet magazine in 2006 about how you went to the memoir section of a book store, and all the other memoirs – by people who either had to live a closeted gay life, or had overcome heroin abuse or something – made you feel like your story wasn’t outstanding in any way. And then in Foreskin’s Lament, you and your wife are having a conversation in which she points out that you were “theologically abused,” and of course, that’s your hook. That’s a pretty good one. But did you really not see that at the time you were shopping for books?
Auslander: No.
Rumpus: It did not occur to you at all?
Auslander: No. But why would it occur to anybody? You know. Besides, I did not want to do it in the first place. As I was doing it I was like, this is the porno of the publishing world.
Rumpus: You think so?
Auslander: Well, no, I do not think so, but that is the perception. And part of the perception is because you go to the bookstore and it’s gay priests, and I fuck sheep, and my mommy was a serial killer, and you are like, why does anyone read this stuff and why am I writing it? And then I would think, okay, god’s an asshole and hates me, but is that enough of a story? Is that really that bad?
Rumpus: I love memoirs, and often my favorites are the ones written by people who do not necessarily have some extreme ailment or tragic story. I felt like your memoir, even though it is so much about being theologically abused, was in many ways universally relatable.
Auslander: Well, I see it, and always kind of saw it, more as a book about someone individuating. The fact that it is from religion is almost irrelevant. I mean it is the source of some of that anger and humor, but it could be anything. It could be any religion, it could be any world. It could have been, you know, my parents were out of control hippies. It could be anything.
Rumpus: Yeah, I think memoirs are often coming-out stories – people “coming out” as themselves and saying, “Look, this who I really am.” I am really wrestling with that myself. I’m caught between being the fake, dutiful cantor’s daughter and being a writer who has some uncomfortable things to say that people, especially my father, won’t like.
Auslander: I get you. So you are in contact with him?
Rumpus: Yeah I am in contact with him, but I have a very conflicted relationship with him. I have not been treated badly the way you were treated. And I do not feel like I can cut him out. Although, there has always been this threat my whole life of him disowning me. His only sister got disowned. He has not spoken to his sister since 1976. She married a Puerto Rican man and became a Jew for Jesus, among other things, so she was out.
Auslander: Is there like some kind of paperwork involved in that? I would not mind sending the forms to my family.
Rumpus: Hmm. I don’t know.
Auslander: I remember reading the actual letter from when Spinoza was excommunicated and it is so satisfying! It is so silly and ridiculous, you know? You are out!
Rumpus: You are never getting back in!
Auslander: When we get the promised land you get nothing! That is so silly. But I was like, wow, I wish I could get one of those.
Rumpus: How long has it been since you have spoken to your family?




9 responses
A good interview which comes off more like a conversation than an interview. I like the part about when things aren’t going well writing-wise: “This is not about publishing or career or selling, it is about you want to go home and play with the kids and not be a fucking asshole, so just write something. So I do, and I feel better. Everything gets filtered through that. This is necessary. This is no choice.” Doesn’t get more honest than that. And it’s a different take on the idea that having kids stops you from writing. Sometimes it forces you to write even more out of an awful kind of desperation. You can’t afford to squander time anymore because, if you have kids, you probably don’t have much of it.
“heroine abuse”?
do tell.
“Heroin abuse.” The “e” has been dropped and the female hero is fine.
Hey, I just figured it was part of the vibe. No worries, mate. =)
I’m sure everyone knows this but me, but is that really his name? “‘Peace’ ‘Outsider’”??? Talk about an oxymoron of a destiny.
oh and I think there’s a mixup of “affect” and “effect” in there somewhere, too.
Sorry. It’s the old copyeditor in me that I just can’t shake.
” I will stand in front of a room full of people who I am very glad are there, but I know that my whole job in my head, in order to write, is to say, “Fuck all of you. I do not care what you think.â€
This is an amazing quote.
I’d translate auslander as foreigner rather than outsider, but that’s just my personal take.
I like your series very much, Sara. I’ve been thinking about it a lot. I guess I feel like I’m saying “forgive me Father for I have sinned. It’s been a whole lifetime since my last confession…” and then I write this stuff. I do not know if anyone wants to read it, ought to read it, why I want to write it. I have to say at the beginning, it’s all not true, so I don’t have to go on Oprah and explain if any of the facts are off-tweaked from the “public record”, like James Frey explaining A Million Little Pieces. (If I wrote of my times in drug treatment, I’m sure I could skew a COUPLE of the facts–although I do remember the names of anyone I had sex with there, against the rules.) Thank you for your provocative series of interviews with memoirists, Sara. I may figure myself out one day, with your help :-), and be able to properly conceive of my writing in its context.
Shawn
Hi Sari,
I’m sorry I called you Sara at least twice in my little comment above. I guess I can’t read very well.
With apologies,
Shawn
It is hard to tell, but I get the impression that Shalom’s family was modern orthodox. I am confused by his attendance at an ultra-orthodox yeshiva for boys, but it could have been cheaper. And, there was mention that money just wasn’t there for them, especially with his father being a carpenter? I don’t think this takes anything away from his story, but it would be nice to know if the fundamentalism is flowing from Chassidic, black hat orthodox, and/or modern orthodox institutions. I worry as a modern orthodox adult that my children who attend a local orthodox institution are not getting a literal/fundamentalist education with respect to their Judaism. I am constantly having the conversation with them about what is it they are learning so as to make sure that they are not receiving a warped mesorah (tradition). When I hear Shalom’s pain, it echoes with me. Even while I didn’t grow up Orthodox, the education I received was filled with ridiculous midrashim (legends) and Chassidic stories from school to adult. Now I am spending a lot of time kicking out all the crap. I actually have no problem with it, that as I don’t fear anything, because here’s the thing. If G-d is real, G-d is not some juvenile G-d that so many people perceive. It cannot be. It would be irreconcilable and absurd.
Click here to subscribe today and leave your comment.