All We Read Is Freaks

A truly amazing personal essay:
Emily Dickinson has had a death grip on my imagination since I first encountered her by way of a lisping, born-again, junior-high English teacher in Easley, South Carolina. Miss Crosswell was a proselytizing stickler, a Quasimodette. She had a zeal for pointless authoritative rubric, stuck sermons into her literature lessons, and was empathetically trollish. A proud graduate of Oral Roberts University, Miss Crosswell heard in Dickinson’s poetry what Miss Crosswell purported to hear in everything: the music of unshakeable faith.
My own household was under the spell of Oral Roberts and his ilk. In the anxious womb of my bun-haired, makeup-free mother, I attended revivals of every televangelist who came near town, from Ernest Angley to Jimmy Swaggart. As I was growing up I noted a pendulous quality in my zealous father: every fit of fanaticism complemented one of deviance. This dynamic prompted my early suspicions that religious faith was infinitely more complicated than the airtight version the adults around me were so desperately marketing. To her credit, Miss Crosswell felt a need to allude to a ribald past she was not proud of, but these obstacles didn’t stop her from seeing Dickinson as her kindred. They both lived alone, in houses with enviable views, saving themselves for some Great Approaching Thing. My inner reactionary accused Miss Crosswell of selective perception, of preferential listening; she seemed to overlook Dickinson’s doubt and wildness and was using her, like Noah used pitch on the ark, to make things stick together, to fill holes.
On the other hand, I’ve done my share of selective perception and preferential listening, too. For the longest time I assumed Dickinson was from the South. (Coming of age in upstate South Carolina can be like growing up in a cauldron that you can’t see out of: Oral Roberts was an authority figure everywhere, right? They watched The Dukes of Hazzard in Denmark, didn’t they? I mean, President Jimmy Carter—pre-empting The Waltons or Hee-Haw—didn’t sound that different from our mayor.) Maybe the Southern associations were forever sealed by my first hearing Dickinson’s poems in Miss Crosswell’s falsetto drawl (was “I never saw a Moor” not about cows?). The poems’ lilting trees, garden snakes, tight-knit communities, horses, farmers, noisy birds, barns, cemeteries, and expanses of darkness sounded just a few power lines, Fords, and crawdads short of an exact description of where I lived. And Dickinson talked like everyone around me who was either doomsaying about death or throwing around crucial conceits from the King James Bible. And that white dress she wore seemed straight out of Gone with the Wind, which my sister and mother watched on holidays. Surely, Emily Dickinson was from some haunted Southern city where they’d witnessed Civil War battles from their rooftops; surely, her tone of bereavement was rooted in commiseration with a town of War widows. She was gothic, right? And didn’t the South have dibs on that?
***
Despite her rarely leaving her (okay, New England) house, there is a spiritual homelessness in Dickinson that I loved even as a youth. She writes of an imaginary spider that is “so much more at Home than I / …I felt myself a visitor.” She refers to countless things, inanimate and animate, as “Souvenirs,” as if she were just passing through this world on her way to somewhere else, which is ironic when one considers how much of her life she spent at home. Much is made of her sense of place, which seems like a no-brainer for such a stationary individual, but I don’t think she’d disagree with Samuel Beckett’s idea that the true artist comes from nowhere.
I had coped with many of the events in my childhood by pretending that my home wasn’t my home and that its people weren’t my people. One practices this for a while, and before one knows it, one suffers from a perpetual disassociation, or Chronic Tourism. One becomes an unscientific anthropologist, absent-mindedly cataloging the ways of the natives. An unfortunate side effect of this syndrome is that one occasionally fails to consider the feelings of one’s subjects. Once, I used the answer blanks of a test—for which I was unprepared—to write a malicious analysis of Miss Crosswell (her fears, her righteousness, her lonely motivation). The assistant principal threatened me with expulsion, saying that my attack had made Miss Crosswell cry, that it had hurt her more than any other blustery teen cruelty she’d weathered. She informed me that Miss Crosswell was one of the few teachers who honestly loved her job, who wasn’t here by some career default. It was decided that I would have to “attend” Miss Crosswell’s class sitting out in the hall until she could accept my apology and allow me to return. Which she never did. Suited me fine; I could be even more of an impartial observer from my desk in the hall. But there was a long-term punishment brewing, one as ironic and tragicomic as that of Tantalus or Sisyphus. I would grow up to be an English teacher freighted with spiritual complications and personal investment in my work, standing in front of an adolescent powder keg, teaching, among other things, the work of Emily frigging Dickinson.
***

Author William Bowers
Dickinson’s poems accompanied me to school in Charleston and Florida—two ideal places for sufferers of Chronic Tourism. I dragged her Complete Poems to jobs and beaches and hammocks and restaurants; I inflicted her on girlfriends, roommates, fishermen, and, once, a meter maid (“Floss won’t save you from an Abyss,” was my early-morning response to her parking ticket.) I got to study Dickinson with two wise old profs nearly blacklisted for their insistence on offering legit, old-school literature courses in a climate of pop and gender and post-colonial fervor. One of them read her aloud with a swashbuckling, proclamatory heft, like a Sermon on the Mount delivered by Teddy Roosevelt. This fanfare approach was shocking, because by then I had a theory that the reason many readers feel so strangely close to Dickinson is that, like an intimate, she whispers to us. For one thing, she uses those hushing—pausing—disarming—dashes. Then, in her drafts, she underlines all those words, which, in their current italics format, only adds to the Sshh! Someone’s coming! mood. And these in poems that are mostly about adumbrated desire.

April 6th, 2010 at 7:50 pm
In a time when standardized tests include testing the ability to read an inter-office memo, when such “literacy” is substituted for the honest attempt to engage with a text which does not aim to eradicate ambiguity, I’m glad to see someone take an ice pick to the permafrost which characterizes not only the intellectual but also the “real” lives of their students. It seems fitting that Emily Dickinson, someone who so emphatically grinds against the apathetic “Youniverse,” is your vehicle for this effort. Extremely moving essay: the comma splice line tore my heart out-halting, haunting. I found the idea that the AP could be someone’s favorite writer a tragic and profound observation of a culture where original, distinctively stylistic writing (not just journalistic writing) must be sought out. I’m thankful for places like the Rumpus where pieces like this can be showcased. Homogenization is not limited to fast food and strip malls. It has been exported to our collective rhetorical and stylistic range. Thank you for the freshness, and the open expression of love for a New England freak who used as many dashes as the vacuous words which riddles most writing today.
April 6th, 2010 at 10:42 pm
Surprised there haven’t been more appreciative comments posted here. I don’t have anything clever to add — just wanted to say know how much I enjoyed the essay.
April 7th, 2010 at 1:53 am
Yes I loved this as well. Beautifully written.
April 7th, 2010 at 2:20 am
Why doesn’t the world have more of this kind of text? Many thanks to the author, of course, but also to Kyle for the finger-waggling endurance it took to give us this.
Thanks.
April 7th, 2010 at 11:52 am
Thank you for unearthing this – and for pointing towards more William Bowers at Pitchfork. I am now a rabid fan after having read the following two sentences in his “Puritan Blister” column (#44) about the band Xiu Xiu: “We, the abused, are parent-haunted to the point of never becoming parents. We stay trauma-bonded to folks who mistreat us while dismissing the well-adjusted and kind.”
It takes a long, long time for some stories to get themselves written.
April 7th, 2010 at 3:48 pm
Hey, that was a tremendous essay; I enjoyed it. It is indeed remarkable when someone writes about an extremely traumatic event and a teacher’s response in the margin is: comma splice.
Hilarious. Mr. Bowers has a tough row to hoe, and I wish him well.
April 9th, 2010 at 9:23 am
“…some students are either so compartmentalized in their religion that they cannot fathom having a spiritual crisis, or they are so secular that salvation and redemption are concepts limited to the realm of coupon-clipping.”
This is the exact reason why I usually feel like an alien on this planet, and also the exact reason why Emily has helped me cope with life’s “fat task.”
Brilliant essay.
April 9th, 2010 at 11:22 am
As a colleague in the community-college realm, I laughed out loud (and a couple times with tears of joyful despair).
As a person who thrashes against finding that mental middle way between my gleaming egomaniac and my weepy dowager (even though I know it’s good for me), I sighed with the momentary peace of recognition.
As a reader who values words, ideas, words, and too much thinking about words, I wanted to pet the writer’s face in gratitude before slapping his butt and telling him to get back out there.
April 11th, 2010 at 11:43 am
Thanks for re-typing this. Well-worth it. I’ll pass it around to a select few (of my fellow CC instructors). It’s long, that’s why there aren’t as many comments as…, and why it took me a week to read… and what can you say but : it’s great, just great!
April 12th, 2010 at 9:03 am
Thank you, Daily Rumpus. I love the work this publication brings to my attention.
April 21st, 2010 at 11:24 am
Thanks so much for this. Humor is a great antidote for existential despair. Well, a good antidote. Mr. Bowers, you are a brave man. I am lucky enough to teach literature in a high school where students have to audition to get in – it is an arts school, a public school. There are always some students who really love reading, and the others are smart enough to get it, and do a reasonably good job of pretending to like it. They are also honest about disliking pretty much everything written before 1900. Especially the Scarlet Letter. Some of them like Crime and Punishment. Some of them are addicted to cell phones and popular culture, but many of them appreciate the grand sweep of human history and culture. They write better than William Bowers’ students, but only a few of them risk exposing their thoughts out loud. I’m not sure why.
And thanks, wood s lot, for introducing me to Rumpus!!! (That’s how I got here.) (Here. Hmmm.)
April 22nd, 2010 at 9:44 am
Excellent essay, thank you! Where else can I find your writing?
February 27th, 2012 at 10:44 am
For a long time I thought William Bowers was kind of a self righteous, cocky English nerd who managed to get published for cleverly shit talking his students, however after reading his actual work I am taken aback. This is a beautiful essay, and also very true to life as far as his students go. I would know, he’s my professor.
April 3rd, 2012 at 1:26 pm
At first I was skeptical (a professor writing about his students’ grammatical errors and inadequacies seemed rather cruel and unfair), but this essay took my breath away more than once. I crave a pat, happy epilogue- but doesn’t that just prove your point?
April 4th, 2012 at 8:11 am
I also came to your writing via your Xiu Xiu odes. As a high school teacher, I thoroughly enjoyed this piece. Keep ‘em coming.
April 4th, 2012 at 10:27 am
Terrific article! -That sounds like marginalia, not my intention. You captured your experience very well and made it glow. -Having trouble getting away from that voice. Well, your writing made me wonder about linguists who reconstruct the sound of Shakespeare’s speech from the phoenetic spelling in his age’s written word, and what those of the future will deduce from ours, in other words you made me think. -Better.
April 4th, 2012 at 10:27 am
as a long time fan of Emily and a former community college student, who went on to the big time, thank you for writing this. sometimes i think we need an organization called “save the poets”. thanks for doing your part.
April 5th, 2012 at 1:38 am
Students could use more clever shit-talking and less micro marketing, making them the lowest common demoninator (one) of their own lives. What gifted narration. We all have it; just got to get that rhythm. Bowers has it, and now maybe some of his kids do.
April 6th, 2012 at 3:22 pm
I thoroughly enjoyed this piece. I taught high school and middle school English in Central Florida until I retired two years ago, so I recognize these students and remember both the despair and joy of teaching. Well done.
April 7th, 2012 at 9:37 am
Greetings. I am a former Remedial English student who was ordered by my tenth-grade English teacher, Barry Buschy, to promise to write every day for the rest of my life. I had a very difficult time understanding what was going on in his Poetry class and did not participate unless under duress, for a fear of sounding like an idiot. But I hung in there. I did not at the time imagine that one could be saved by language and yet I took his advice, which indeed saved me. I went on to a lower-tier state school, transferred to a better one, then on to grad school. I became, you guessed it: a teacher, first at a community college, then at a very rural public school. I am currently in a well-regarded MFA program for Fiction, something for which no one who knew me back then, including myself, could have hoped.
The point of all this is that I suspect Poetry is out there for the overlooked. As a (metaphorical) needle in a haystack, I thank you for your work and for this excellent essay.
April 26th, 2012 at 5:56 am
As someone who teaches Emily Dickinson in a small college in Ireland, this had surprising resonance. An excoriating and wonderfully wry snapshot of third level poetry teaching. I can’t help but leave this poem by an Irish Poet, Louis MacNeice, to offer some justification for the reading and teaching of poetry:
To Posterity
When books have all seized up like books in graveyards
And reading and even speaking have been replaced
By other, less difficult, media, we wonder if you
Will find in flowers and fruit the same colour and taste
They held for us for whom they were framed in words,
And will your grass be green, your sky be blue,
Or will your birds be always wingless birds?
October 6th, 2012 at 1:44 pm
Teachers like Bowers should be tracked down like dogs, then be made President of the institution where they teach. Triple their salary, and make them continue teaching. God knows our sinking country needs them!