Who Needs Philosophy?

Back when I was a little boy, living in a yellow stucco house in San Diego, I would sit in the hot tub at night, under desert-clear stars, listen to the coyotes howl and ask my Dad about those dead ancient Greek guys who only had first names: Aristotle, Socrates, Plato. He didn’t know why they didn’t have last names, but he did tell me that they dedicated their entire lives to contemplation and navel-gazing in the service of the good life.

That’s what I want to do, I thought.

(Unfortunately, we had to rip out that hot tub not soon after because a family of rattlesnakes was nesting under it.)

So I didn’t exactly become a philosopher, although I enjoy reading it, now and again. In fact, I haven’t exactly become anything official, except a guy who loves to read and write and who works in a bookstore. I’ve always thought, though, that philosophy is better at helping people with their problems than psychology. And that novels are even better at doing that than either.

I do think that most people who aren’t college students, academics, or scholars don’t care much about philosophy, at least from my limited point of view behind the counter at a used bookstore in San Francisco. And really why should they?  I was amazed recently when an older Bernal Heights resident was asking about a specific Kierkegaard book and whether we had it or not. (We didn’t.) Who reads Kierkegaard anymore? I never did, but I do remember he coined the phrase, “Truth is subjectivity,” which I believe I learned from the Internet instead of from the famous man himself.

Part of the problem of readership, I think, is that since the late 60’s philosophy has become an amalgam of cultural studies, sociology, political cant and psychoanalytic abstractions that all fall under the rubric of “Theory,” a shadowy discipline full of made-up words and famously unfathomable sentences that are prey to infamous mockeries. Not that “Theory” is bad — I spent a lot of my college years studying it —  but it doesn’t necessarily help people lead a good life or find happiness of do all the things that philosophy is supposed to do.

I do have a suspicion though that these “New Hard Times” will be a catalyst for renewed interest in philosophical consolation. In a time when all institutions are in question, but especially our financial ones, it seems natural that we’d start questioning our values and especially how we define happiness, now that money certainly is no measure of it.

It’s a good sign when a real philosopher, Simon Critchley, has an occasional column in the New York Times about finding happiness in troubled times. An English philosopher in the Continental tradition, he believes that disappointment, both religious and political is at the root of all philosophy. He writes in a lucid, plain-spoken way that compels rereading other great thinkers like the Greek Stoics, the Enlightenment genius Rousseau and even Oscar Wilde.

From Critchley’s May 25th blog, “Happy Like God”: “Happiness is not quantitative or measurable and it is not the object of any science, old or new. . .If it consists in anything, then I think that happiness is this feeling of existence, this sentiment of momentary self-sufficiency that is bound up with the experience of time.”

His most recent book, The Book Of Dead Philosophers is a round-up of famous philosopher’s deaths, based on the theory that  sometimes how you die is the most important thing you’ll ever do.  Critchley almost believes that it is what happens after we die — not to us, but to others– that invest our lives with purpose. In “How To Make It In The Afterlife,” he asks, “Why doesn’t it make much better sense to live in such a way — to act kindly, fairly, courageously, decently — in such a way that happiness is something that others might ascribe to you after you are gone?”

More Critchley: video of his inaugral lecture at the New School, Branding Democray: Barack Obama And The American Void.

And finally: a strange organization he is affiliated with, International Necronautical Society which, believe it or not, is loosely affiliated with the A.A.A., better known as the Association Of Autonomous Astronauts. Those are the people who want to build their own spaceships. . .which brings me back to my original point: who doesn’t love philosophy?

SHARE

IG

FB

BSKY

TH

5 responses

  1. Diana Avatar

    I, for one, love philosophy. And you’d be surprised how many people read Kierkegaard. He’s the fifth most popular philosopher after Plato, Aristotle, Nietzsche, and Descartes in our little town of Seattle.

  2. Yes, I should say that I love philosophy too, but I can understand not loving it at the same time. My love for it is highly mitigated and usually I turn to novels for a sense of philosophical insight. At the same time, I feel that philosophers are vital and that we shouldn’t forget that philosophy and politics came about simultaneously, and that one can’t be righteous without the other.

  3. Melissa Avatar
    Melissa

    I love some philosophy too. Mostly I’ve read political philosophy, while rolling large rocks up small hills–and daydreaming of what other kinds of rocks I could be rolling up other kinds of hills.

  4. Melissa's Dad Avatar
    Melissa’s Dad

    Comments

    1. For Plato and Aristotle, determining the nature of the good life (the best life) is certainly important but this represents only a minor fraction of their total philosophic output, written material.

    2. In the context of philosophy overall, the good life problem represents only a very small portion of what philosophy is about and this can be verified by flipping through any good encyclopedia of philosophy.

    3. Arthur Schopenhauer argued that the goal of human life is not happiness; it is unhappiness. His view is futilitarianism.

    4. A.J. Ayer argued that the question of the meaning of life is a meaningless question. The assumption this question contains, that there is a universal purpose for all humans is false. Life’s meaning is matter of personal decision and varies from person to person. Ethical skepticism or ethical relativism.

    5. For Kant, the proper goal of life is not simply happiness (the overall satisfaction of desires, the natural good) it is happiness which is deserved on the basis of being a moral person, a virtuous person. Happiness is a part, not the whole, of the purpose. The goal is the complete good and this has two parts: the moral good (virtue)and the natural good (happiness).

    6. Having spent a lot of time searching in the area of the philosophy of life, there is one book I recommend as amazingly good. It is by the (now deceased) Harvard philosopher Robert Nozick, and it is called The Examined Life (1989) Simon and Schuster. Some of it is written for laypersons and some of it is not.

  5. Bruce W Avatar
    Bruce W

    I have done extensive searching in the area of the philosophy of life and I recommend the following as by far the best book in this area. It is by Harvard philosopher Robert Nozick and is called The Examined Life (1989, Simon and Schuster). It is amazingly good.

Click here to subscribe today and leave your comment.