“I know that books don’t save lives on the grand scale. They don’t end wars and such. They don’t cure cancer. But at the same time, books saved my life. And I know they’ve done that for friends of mine.”
— At The Nervous Breakdown, Rob Roberge interviews himself, and it is excellent.
But I’m not sure what to think about this part.
I’d say books have done a helluva lot more on a grand scale than, say, electoral politics (call me jaded.) I mean, haven’t books played a major part in ending most wars? How many Nobel Peace Prize winners are also writers? But it’s also true that most books don’t have a huge effect on a grand scale. Still, couldn’t the smaller effect of a lot of books saving the lives of its readers be more important than a grand scale effect of one big book?
What do you think?