I grew up in Hawaii, so I have no concept of going away on “spring break”, but Harmony Korine has clearly schooled me in what I seemed to not have missed in his raunchy, pulpy, neon-fueled reflection of young America, Spring Breakers.
The opening montage of this romp is filled with budding tatas, American-colored popsicles-as-dicks, and girls who don’t look old enough to drive doing bong rips. But what looks right out of MTV’s Spring Break quickly devolves into a nightmarish echo of capitalist culture.
It’s no surprise, and quite a delightful choice, that Disney’s darlings are culled to play demon teenage girls who cruise through the film in bikinis and ski masks, holding up people at first with squirt guns and moving quickly along to blasting people to death Natural Born Killers style. While the obvious subversion of casting Disney stars as soulless gun-toters could have fallen flat, it was repeatedly met with delight.
The trailer for the film prepared me for what I anticipated to be a whole truckload of misogyny. It’s clear that only in a male fantasy would college girls spend their time in class drawing hearts that say ‘I love penis’ inside of them, drink out of squirt guns, and do handstands in their underwear. But suprisingly, just when the audience is positioned in an exploitative stance as we watch the four teenage girls in bikinis shotgunning weed and stroking each other’s hair in a faux-lesbionic fashion, Korine turns the trope on his head, making the four youngsters base and nihilistic. These aren’t girls gone wild, they’re girls gone wrong. They seem to care about nothing (save for Selena Gomez who turns in the only emotional performance of the film as a born-again Christian roped in with the wrong crowd), and proceed to blindly rob, steal and kill anything in sight.
After holding up a chicken shack, wearing short shorts and powder blue hoodies, they have enough money to go to Florida for spring break, where they meet a gangster rapper named Alien, played with panache and eerie conviction by James Franco. Franco sips through his silver grill, and his corn rows shake around like a wild lawn sprinkler as he ushers the girls into the world of St. Petersburg, Florida.
He takes the girls round in his Camaro (license plate BALLR), and introduces them to his life of hustling, though to his surprise they seem to need no introduction. In a gripping scene two of the girls turn the gun on him, and make him fellate his own hardware. There’s also a very Korine-esque scene where Franco’s character Alien plays Britney Spears’ “Everytime” on a white grand piano situated on the deck of his pool, while the girls stand around holding machine guns, wearing pink ski masks and sweat pants that say DTF (down to fuck), even though the girls in this film have very little fucking on their minds. And that brings us a central problem with Spring Breakers: the protagonists of the film seem to have no real desire. Can you have characters without desire? The lineage of art seems to say no, though Korine seems to be asserting that desirelessness is our cultural inheritance.
When Alien says, “Big booties and money is what life’s all about”, for a second I had to reconsider what life is all about. Had I gotten it wrong this whole time? Was my belief that life is about truth and beauty just a dreamer’s fantasy? Have I become un-American?
If nothing else, Spring Breakers seems to be just another way of saying what we’ve known for a long time: consumerism is eating us alive. In fact, our real desires have been wholly replaced by manufactured ones. The girls in the film, when presented with buckets of cash, reply, “Seeing all this money makes my tits look bigger.” And the insidiousness of subliminal advertising plays a role via Alien’s repetition of the phrase “spring break” which he whispers over and over throughout the film, even when he’s not on screen, like a narrative mantra lulling us into a capitalist-induced coma.
It’s this base need to be a cog in the money-making machine that is the nexus of Spring Breakers message, if there is one. The girls tell each other affirmations in the form of, “just pretend like you’re in a video game” and “act like you’re in a movie or something” – could not those phrases be instructive for anyone dealing with modern life?
When one of the girls hesitates, the others get firm and say, “you have to be hard”. Welcome to the new economy ladies! There seems to be no time to develop ethics when struggling to get by financially. How do you get to Florida for spring break and eventually pay for your student loans? By dealing drugs and robbing people (duh!). It’s not a sad statement of where we’re at; it’s a damning one.
And aside from all that, the there’s the issue of race. The one time we see the girls in school, the topic at hand is the civil rights movement, but instead of paying attention to Emmett Till on the screen, they’re busy doodling testicles in their notebooks. While many students went south in support of equal rights for African Americans during the civil rights movement, the young stars of Spring Breakers return South to rob and then eventually kill a party full of black men. That’s quite a portrait of how little we’ve come, if we’ve come anywhere at all.
The film’s characters of color only exist on screen to remind us just how much white culture has stolen from them. The character of Alien, faux-rapper, middling gangster, is meant to be an apex of appropriation. The fact that Franco’s character learns everything he knows from fellow Black ganster Archie (played by Gucci Mane), and then has him killed is an obvious metaphor for white suburban consumption of hip hop culture. Additionally, to have two white girls in bikinis blow up an entire party of Archie’s crew, without suffering one scratch, seems gratuitous and sick, though that seems to be the film’s point. While Korine doesn’t seem to have the intellectual chops to fully deal with the issue of race, his film at least nods to the fact that he’s aware. Every artist has their limitations and Spring Breakers is more reflection of racial tension than analysis.
In the end Spring Breakers is much like having sex with a praying mantis—an experience that seduces at first then spits you out headless, and thus brainless. Which is not to say that the film is dumb, but rather that it’s mind-numbing. It’s a testament to the fact that we’re easily seduced by bright lights and hypnotic base lines. The film’s success can largely be attributed to the flashy neon cinematography courtesy of Benoît Debie and the trance-like editing of Douglas Crise. Throughout the film I was repeatedly reminded of the pulp-nod of Drive, so it came as no surprise to learn that the video-pumped soundtrack was created by Cliff Martinez (who scored Drive) and Skrillex.
Korine is nearing 40, (how long can you be referred to as an enfant terrible?) and I suspect Spring Breakers is more likely to appeal to aging film critics, middle-aged men, and women who never got a spring break (see:me) than the completely non-existent demographic of 18-year-old nihilist girls in neon bikinis. If that demographic actually existed, we’d all be doomed. Let’s be grateful, this once, for the pulp and fantasy, but not forget that the reflection comes right from the other end of the looking glass.





6 responses
Sounds right up my alley. Thanks for the review, I had heard nothing about this film.
It should also be pointed out that Gucci’s character remains the ever present violent threat. He is the ugly black other. Rather than praising the film for its supposed ironic portrayal of grotesque racist stereotypes, it should be pointed out that it also upholds, without irony, those same racist cliches. This is an utterly flat film without substance. I honestly cannot believe how many positive reviews I keep encountering.
Brandon – I wasn’t trying to suggest the portrayal was ironic, but rather that it is grotesque and reflective as you say. I don’t think the film is trying to do anything but reflect the racist consumer state of our culture. Whether or not that approach of reflection meets your standard for what makes a film good is another issue. It should also be noted that the girls and Alien are a consistent violent threat. The ugly white other….
The girls and alien aren’t an “other”, though. They may be ugly, and their interiority is certainly compromised by their desirelessness (which is a really great point and I’m glad you discussed it; I think is vital to understanding how the film operates as a satire), they are still protagonists, not others.
I think this movie is saying some very interesting stuff about white privilege, objectification, capitalism and authenticity – But that doesn’t mean it’s not perpetuating some of that stuff as well, that’s it not operating under the same oppressive systems in some ways.
I’m not really buying the issues with some groups being marginalized, or “othered,” in this movie. It is all about viewpoints (as the reviewer points out). For instance, sure the main girls are shown to be having a blast during their mostly-white idealized spring break adventures (before their arrest), but of course they were loving it: it was there ideal spring break. I (as a native Floridian, no less), found their ideal (white, MTV) spring break to be disgusting. But that was the girls’, to quote Alien, “American Dream.” Alien had a different ideal, as did Archie.
What is interesting about a place like Florida is that, like depicted in this movie, you can be at a beautiful, pristine beach with expensive houses and condos all around you, but then drive for no more than 5 minutes and be in a poor, crime-ridden neighborhood. And the great part is: it isn’t about race! You can find a bad area that is predominantly African American; another that is mostly Latino/a; another that is Haitian American; and let us not forget about the predominantly white trailer parks, which is where to go when one wants to illicit illegal substances. The point is, and I really think Korine tapped into this (at least to me as a local), is that we are all “othered” here if Florida depending on where we are at that moment.
As opposed to racism, I think that Korine did a nice job of portraying the discomfort about being put in a situation that one is not familiar with: in this case, a young girl (Selena Gomez) from a small town suddenly dropped into a situation where she is now marginalized, in more ways than one: in the larger scheme of things she is surrounded by people are do not look like her (including Alien), which may be a situation she has never been in. On another level, she has been “othered” by her friends: she has never really stood for what her friends stood for, and for the first time they are willing to leave her behind or, more appropriately, send her on her way. Her friends are more like Alien than they are like her, but she has a certain level of comfort with them due to them having grown up together.
To say that this film is without substance is unbelievable: Korine, as a film maker, has always managed to take a snapshot of a particular aspect of society and show it, rather unflinchingly, to the audience. Plot, characterization, and a moral aren’t his objective: it is just a snapshot of an aspect(s) of society for the viewer to do with it what he/she may.
I, for one, and my wife, for two, saw this movie and were definitely blown away: it exceeded our expectations and we will probably watch it again, as we have been talking about it ever since. This movie has generated conversation on important topics: those mentioned in this review, and others. It points out many negative aspects of society. Acting, directing, cinematography, score and soundtrack were all top notch, not to mention the level of humor: this movie is funny, which is indeed an effective tool while examining serious topics.
Also, I do not believe that the line between protagonist and antagonist is is so clear cut: if you are able to look at the protagonists in this movie and think that they are, 100% of the time, absolute protagonists, then that is a very limited way to watch a film. Selena Gomez’s character may be the only one who doesn’t blur the line: the 3 girls besides her and Alien are the main characters in this movie, and they all have positive and negative aspects, but mostly negative. There is a big difference between protagonists primary characters.
I love you. That is all. Now get me the ski mask and let’s retire in FLA. “Spriiiinnnnng Breeaaaak…”
Click here to subscribe today and leave your comment.