»
«

SWINGING MODERN SOUNDS #33: The Sweet Spot

Rick Moody bio ↓  ·  January 20th, 2012  ·  filed under music, Rick Moody, rumpus original

When I was expecting not to like the album–because I thought maybe history was right, and Eno’s only recent breakthroughs were going to be the installation pieces and Bloom (I haven’t even talked about Bloom yet!), his iPhone app–I nonetheless decided to give Drums Between the Bells a listen one night, the album, when I had really bad insomnia. I was thinking, There is no way that I’m going to like these poems, because … because, well, because I have trouble with the word “poem,” and whenever I see the word “poem,” I want to the poem to be a victim burnt at the stake signaling through the flames, and unless the poem has this much going on in it, it’s going to leave me cold. Don’t talk to me of love, unless you are Dido awaiting Aeneas on the pyre, and don’t write lyrics unless you actually have something to say, and for godsakes, don’t speak of your lyrics as though they were poems. But still: I had insomnia, and it was the middle of the night, and I downloaded a track from the album, the track called “Bless This Space,” and initially I didn’t like the groove, because the synth part sounded like this sort of trashy synth preset, “fat synth” that I associate with a Casio or something similarly well-traveled, but then once the lyrics started, and we had the oddly stiff and limpid and alluring reading by Eno himself, saying: “bless this space/in sound and rhyme/as we suspend it/arrested from the race/for meaning/by these slices/of cityscapes” Well, it was hard not to be compelled. In fact, it’s possible that awake, at three or four in the morning, listening to the song on headphones, while my daughter drowsed nearby, was in someway the perfect listening situation for Drums Between the Bells, itself reminding me of those lines by W. C. Williams, “If I in my north room/dance naked, grotesquely/before my mirror/waving my shirt round my head/and singing softly to myself:/”I am lonely, lonely./I was born to be lonely,/I am best so! . . . Who shall say I am not/the happy genius of my household?” My experience of “Bless This Space” was like that experience, the experience of Williams’s narrator, and so I saw something in “Bless This Space” that I might not have seen, heard, otherwise, namely its absolute fidelity to its earnest resolve, and upon coming to believe that that earnest resolve was good, that I should not second guess it, I came to see how potent the drumming was on the truck, the syncopation, and some really fancy rolls, perhaps edited slightly, but nonetheless drums with the real warmth and truth of acoustic drumming, and then a guitar solo like a pair of squirrels falling out of a tree, squirrels wrestling, and suddenly I was a believer. It didn’t matter that the original synth part sounded too plug-and-play, I believed in the blessing part of the song, and in the strange decontextualization of the poem in Eno’s performance, both blessing and mechanization, as rendered there. The next one I tried, and there is no real reason that I tried, this particular track, there was no method, and with Eno there should always be the possibility of random sorting in the listening experience, was “Seedpods,” which does not follow “Bless This Space” on the album, but which has, in stark contrast to the preset-like synth part on “Bless This Space,” a ridiculously infectious groove, one that achieves some of its effect because of the presence of shakers. Yes, I mean those little percussion items. Shakers that actually require people to shake them. I derive great pleasure from the idea of Eno, at home, in his studio, recording the shaker part for “Seedpods.” As opposed to using a shaker sample. And in this fantasy Eno is not in some luxury studio (because a lot of the record was recorded at home, as most of his work is these days), but waking up one morning, between doing interviews on cybernetics, taking the time to record the shakers, instead. However: hesitating over the shakers for too long will keep me from describing the vocal presentation here. The vocalist is a woman, one Caroline Wildi, whom I believe to be an actresss, and she brings a palpable joy to the very eccentric lyric: “all over London/the clicker of seedpods/against passing buses/organism/or prism/heart light divided/heart sound machine/in different souls/trying to pick the bones . . .” Or something like that! The lyrics are not available in the booklet, so I am trying to reconstruct them. I’m trying to reconstruct the way that Wildi’s joy, in delivering these lyrics, works in the context of the aforementioned groove, a groove that is resistant to its electronic origins, which may be why some listeners to Drums Between the Bells resist the album for not being electronic enough, or not up-to-date enough as contribution to the genre of electronica, when that, for me, is not what it’s about, but what it is about, is a belief in whatever poetry is, and an idea about using whatever poetry is for your lyrical basis, and in believing, mattering, and mattering making pop music less disposable.

Photo of Rick Holland, by Charlie Campbell

There are vocal performances on this album that are inadequate, on purpose, for example the Italianate English of “Pour It Out,” which so dramatically improves the song. The guitar part on “Pour It Out,” which serves as the better part of the sonic bed, is a dead ringer for a guitar piece on Apollo: Atmospheres and Soundtracks, sort of country, sort of ambient, but Italian accent of Laura Spagnuolo, especially on such resolutely hard-to-read lines as “it is weird release/to imagine the miniscule/where deep sea molluscs/can glow orange in tendrils/and haemoglobin nodules exist,” raises the song up out of the off-kilter country-and-western into some surging narrative bit of tenderness. Spagnuolo is not a reader, not capable of reading, and so she doesn’t read like a reader, but like someone who is discovering the English language while speaking it, and so the poem is disrupted and made to exist as a sequence of very unusual sounds, just as the music, by the use of these strange, and frequently arresting words, is disrupted, and caused to be other than it first appears. The same is true in “Glitch,” where Graznya Goworek is auto-tuned, and made especially glitchy to serve as both theme and method, and it’s worth mentioning the booklet in this case, where Eno’s layout of the lyrics much resembles John Cage’s old Finnegans Wake pieces, in which there was sense across both a line of text, and up and down.

“The Real” is also an especially beautiful piece here, again, using an ambient field not entirely unfamiliar to longtime listeners of Eno (it reminds me a bit of “An Ending,” also from Apollo, and might even be a sample or a re-edit of that track), but made new and more compelling by the problematic proposed in the lyric itself: “the flourish/seeing the real in things/really seeing the real/describing the exact actuality/of what it is you see/or what it is you seem to see/you really seem to see the real . . .” Elisha Mudly’s voice, adolescent, uncomplicated, through its naïf charm, makes the real a possibility (though the non-existence of the real seems to have been settled long ago), and in this sense the song is a triumph of literary material over electronics, delivering on an allegedly impossible task, an electronic composition that feels deeply organic and touching, while nonetheless having a vocoded, auto-tuned section in the middle where the machines reread what has been carefully “sung.” There’s so much humanness on the track you can almost hear Mudly rustling the pages. There are mouth sounds, and the sound of the interior in which the actress read  the poem. Does Eno himself despair of the real? Or does Eno admit that the real is here, in the recording, far beyond all the cultural and philosophical disputes that might argue against the real? Holland’s lyric has a bit of the opening of Joyce’s Finnegans Wake, too, “riverrun, past Eve and Adam’s, from swerve of shore to bend of bay, brings us by a commodius vicus of recirculation back to Howth Castle and Environs.” Holland wants to efface the real and accept the real, and in that way he makes poetry transportative and contemporary at the same time. And yet until the poem is entrapped in the amber of Mudly’s reading, and in Eno’s original electronic score that is not entirely original, since partly self-plagiarized, it does not have the great beauty that it ought to have. Then it arrives at its incredibly sad last line, “the real is done,” and suddenly the work arrives at its purpose. Holland is young, and Mudly is even younger, but Eno is not, and it’s the bittersweet architecture of the piece, made by a middle-aged person, though composed by another, that makes “the real is done” so sad.

Eno reserves the deepest perception of the album for himself on “Breath of Crows,” whose tinkling and echo-laden bells frankly recalled On Land. Eno sings this one, and this amounts to a paradox on an album of “spoken word,” an album which is not a spoken word album, and which is not an album of pop songs, and is not even an album of music, but something that amounts to a hybrid of all these. “Breath of Crows” is very close, if you leave aside the bells (perhaps the bells alluded to in the title), to electronic noise. It is only by happenstance that it is musical, and that is part of what’s so unsettling about it. Holland’s lyric here concerns theological (and anti-theological) matters, and the recoiling therefrom, as indicated in the first line, “my god is in the breath of crows/it grows and shrinks with nature’s whim,” and, later, “it must be absolute this god.” I am making these lyrics my own today, because Eno doesn’t print these lyrics, nor are these lyrics generally accessible on the web, and that is of some interest, that these lyrics are here alone for now, and Eno’s improvised melody, which does not have a conventional melodic movement, but feels, rather, improvised over the ambience,.which amounts to a rather creepy seventh chord, is of the Carnatic variety, or so it feels to me, because the Carnatic tradition is primarily vocal, and Eno here is improvising, as one would improvise in Carnatic tradition, moreover the scale, in which the seventh note is played first, in the bass, before the root note, is, I guess, locrian, and locrian is not unlike the way sevenths and ninths work in Vedic chants, and perhaps in this way the theology of “Breath of Crows” is of a pantheistic or non-Western shape, May I not delude my eyes, the narrator says, meaning may all religious experience be not doctrinal, but full of woe and passionate observation equally, rooted in the paradoxical real as indicated above. We don’t know what the real is, the breath of crows suggests, but we know how it feels.

There’s a lot that I haven’t said about Drums Between the Bells yet, and that’s after almost eight thousand words. There’s a lot more I might do to indicate the awe that I associate with the advent of this album, there’s a lot more to say about the voices, and about the “dance oriented” numbers, and the way that Eno confronts expectations about “dance music” and with ideas of “intelligent dance music,” reiterating how art plays a part in all of this, while at the same time making an album that is surpassingly British in some ways (I can’t even think of this album without the moment in “Seedpods” when Caroline Wildi says “All over London . . .”), or at least that it has a terrain in which its effects find their origin, and that is a British terrain. I might have said more about the surprise of the whole thing, about the way drums continue to be used in Eno with marked originality, and I might have said more about the variety of vocalists, and about the whole was done modestly, far more modestly, let’s say, than recent recordings by Jay Z or Beyoncé, and yet with more care or certainty than any of these recordings. And this recording was made by a man who will be 64 on his next birthday, and while other musicians of his generation rest on their laurels, go on the road performing songs they wrote nearly a half century before, Eno has done no such thing, has almost never performed his own songs, at all, and has turned his back on almost every tendency in his own output, embracing, contrarily, opposition over consonance, happenstance over intention, conceptual heterodoxy, pathos where least expected, and all of this long after the Sweet Spot, when the Sweet Spot would long seem to have migrated over to, I suppose, Radiohead, or, maybe, Kurt Vile, though the days will come when these artists will clamor for the respect they once took for granted.

I was somewhere on the road, not so long ago, don’t remember where, and again completely beyond sleep, and sitting in a tub in a hotel I never would have been able to afford, were it not for the largesse of some festival, or book publisher, in that despair which is the loss of all things, of all relevant handholds, in the tub, as the water slowly cools toward that lukewarm which is the universal temperature required for self-slaughter, and I had just downloaded Bloom, which is a software program devised by Brian Eno and Peter Chilvers in which you simply touch your touchscreen and certain rather euphonic sounds emanate from a visual field of impressionist bubbles, and these replay and decay rather slowly, while some Eno-ish drones drone in the distant sonic space. If you are too lazy to fashion your little pizzicato stabs of sound, Bloom will do it for you. Eno describes the whole thing, I believe, as his composition, which is sort of like La Monte Young saying that he picked the one note that the Theatre of Eternal Music used to play, but who wants to quibble? You compose what Eno composed first. The thing plays itself, and you can intervene, or you can just let the breath of crows play the thing while you lay there cooling toward absolute zero, toward the time when all of our musical gestures will sound like Eno’s best compositions, little desperate iterations of sonic order against a backdrop of white noise, radio static, and then silence, and if this is what it means to be no longer in your Sweet Spot, that you are capable of making Drums Between the Bells, on the one hand, and Bloom on the other, so that very nearly dead in the heartless hotel interiors of the post-industrial wasteland are afforded a few more minutes of relative comfort, just before capitalism finishes them off, then I say we should all be so lucky as to be beyond our sweet spots.

Pages: 1 2 3 4

Read the whole article on one page

Related Posts

···
Rick Moody's newest novel is THE FOUR FINGERS OF DEATH, from Little, Brown. He has a new solo album out, called THE DARKNESS IS GOOD, released on Dainty Rubbish Records. Moody also plays music with The Wingdale Community Singers, whose recently released album is called SPIRIT DUPLICATOR. Both albums are available at Amazon, iTunes, and CDBaby.com. More from this author →

12 Responses to “SWINGING MODERN SOUNDS #33: The Sweet Spot”

  1. John Francisconi Says:

    Whoa. This is incredible.

  2. Ben McCormack Says:

    Obsolutely astounding and inspiring like the works it references.

  3. Kevin Thomas Says:

    Agreed, incredible. My one tiny question: why isn’t 1974—the year of Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy), John Cale and Genesis—included in the Sweet Spot?

  4. Rick Moody Says:

    Kevin, agreed, it was a fine year. Although I would say that I think TAKING TIGER MOUNTAIN is the least perfect of the early solo albums. I like “Third Uncle” and “The Third Wheel,” but some of the other stuff feels less perfect, whereas what happened the following year is indisputably masterful, at least to these ears. I also agree the Cale albums are GREAT, and that Eno managed to snatch the mixed bag of LAMB LIES DOWN ON BROADWAY from the jaws of defeat and make parts of it far better than they had any right to be, thereby meeting the rhythm section (Phil Collins, Percy Jones) that would make ANOTHER GREEN WORLD so fab. I will not quibble about dates, but I will that a base ten numeral is traditionally more fitting than a base eleven numeral.

  5. Donald Says:

    Some Girls was right for its moment, yes, but the moment was 1978, Rick, not 1975 (that was Black and Blue). And I’m with Kevin, re: Tiger Mountain. I see where you’re coming from with AGW, and for ages I placed it at the pinnacle of Eno’s Enodom, but these days I’m with TTM because its lyrics are so completely whimsically brilliant and it has the nerve to be the best ‘glam’ LP of that era (which is to say that, in 1974, it’s riding an earlier sweet spot, the one that demands glam in ’72-’74). THAT Eno must be acknowledged. That said, the Eno that emerges from AGW through Airport is the real deal, and remarkably sui generis.

  6. M. Says:

    Radiohead can do (almost) no wrong in my ears, in my ears, but overall AMEN to this and extra points for bringing the funny:

    Which means: that the problem now, as history proposes it, and as Eno himself has noted (in different words) is this: how can you write lyrics that are not fucking dumb. The fucking dumb lyrics everywhere around us. To take two examples of artists produced by Eno: U2 now writes lyrics that are fucking dumb, and Coldplay writes some of the fucking dumbest lyrics around. Fucking dumb! Ridiculous! The kind of pabulum that you just cannot bear to listen without wincing a little! I defy you not to wince while listening to Coldplay. Coldplay makes me want to crawl under the proverbial rock. And I will go further and advance an unpopular opinion, but I happen to think that even Radiohead writes fucking dumb lyrics, or at least that they have done so for a good four or five years now. Thom Yorke complains! Some other people who write fucking dumb lyrics? The Rolling Stones. Fucking dumb! The last good Rolling Stones lyrics was “Undercover of the Night,” and I think that was 1983. That’s twenty-seven years without a good lyric. The entire genre of contemporary R&B is noted for its fucking dumb lyrics. Beyoncé? Fucking dumb. John Legend? Rihanna? Fucking dumb. Those are lyrics designed for twelve year olds. And since I am no longer twelve, and have not been for almost forty years, I should not have to listen to them, or, at the very least, I should not be obliged to call them art. And the same goes for Adele. I am glad for Adele that at her rather young age there seem to be entire radio stations that do nothing but play her album over and over, and she does have a really extraordinary voice, and it was extraordinary when it was Amy Winehouse’s voice, but that does not mean that her lyrics are not fucking dumb.

  7. Valerie Says:

    Another album that bears mentioning is the 1990 Eno/Cale collaboration: “Wrong Way Up,” which is sung by both. In my opinion, it takes the conventional pop-format, three-minute song, to its absolute most perfect state throughout.

  8. John Buckley Says:

    This is really well done, and well thought through. I agree with almost all of it, and am aligned with the sentiments. Yes, it’s a mistake to downplay the greatness of “Taking Tiger Mountain By Strategy” — not even to reference “Mother Whale Eyeless!” But Rick, you are exactly right about Lou, about Coldplay, and I am almost with you on the Talking Heads point — though I would shift earlier and say the Sweet Spot ended with “Fear of Music.”. The only thing missing is a reference to Robert Wyatt! Nicely done.

  9. John Domini Says:

    Many compliments on this, alive with thought & care & rare discernment. The best I can contribute would be a couple of lines that’ve stayed with me from E.L. Doctorow’s fanatasia on the young Bob Dylan, “The Songs of Billy Bathgate” (a story from 1968 that has nothing to do with the later novel): “…since history is riding in you everything you do turns out to be right. Everything adds on, even what you do to diminish yourself…. It is a nerve-shredding bag when history makes you a gift of the world.”

  10. Rick Moody Says:

    And when it no longer does so!

    John: yes on Rob’t Wyatt. A true genius. I love that album SHLEEP a whole lot, and Eno makes excellent contributions. Also: MUSIC FOR AIRPORTS would not be the same without his contribution.

  11. Rick Gray Says:

    Rick,

    Music for Airports was the most exotic gem your brother ever smuggled back to our dorm room in Ohio. There was always anticipation and excitement on Dwight’s return from another of his trips back East: What strange, new sound would be revealed this time? (I’m assuming he was ransacking your room while you were away, though he always credited you as the source, and spoke of your music collection with awe). After one of Dwight’s returns it was the voice of Kate Bush that pierced through the dorm fog of dope and the Dead, turning heads and reawakening those who had already passed out. Another time it was the screeching guitar work of Adrien Belou charging like a rhino through the dorm hallways and out into the university cemetary, visible from our smoke-stained window, where the Midwestern dead turned in their graves. But it was Music for Airports I remember most. Dwight had the cool aura of an art thief as he lifted the cassette out of his pack and slid it into our stereo; he knew he had stolen a masterpiece this time, and was about to blow our minds.

    And it did. We never spoke of this music after it was over, only looked over at each other with the collective embarrassment of those who had possibly seen a UFO. Even a pot high felt banal and even stupid in its ambient glow, and its intelligence, and we knew it would be better to keep quiet about it.

    Rick Gray

    Kabul, Afghanistan

  12. Max Taylor Says:

    Rick, I’m wondering if you have ever read Jonathan Lethem’s February 28, 2005, New Yorker piece, titled “The Beards”? http://bit.ly/xq1040

Leave a Reply

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.